Radeon HD 6610M vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Radeon HD 6610M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
23.99
+1566%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms HD 6610M by a whopping 1566% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking233995
Place by popularity56not in top-100
Power efficiency28.083.89
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGN20-P0Whistler
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2011 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048480
Core clock speed1238 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHzno data
Number of transistorsno data716 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)26 Watt
Texture fill rateno data10.80
Floating-point processing powerno data0.432 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data25.6 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_211.2 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.0
OpenGLno data4.4
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-N/A

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
+2033%
3−4
−2033%
1440p47
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
4K30
+2900%
1−2
−2900%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 71
+1675%
4−5
−1675%
Counter-Strike 2 42
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+2100%
3−4
−2100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 54
+1700%
3−4
−1700%
Battlefield 5 93
+1760%
5−6
−1760%
Counter-Strike 2 38
+1800%
2−3
−1800%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+1633%
3−4
−1633%
Far Cry 5 68
+1600%
4−5
−1600%
Fortnite 110−120
+1817%
6−7
−1817%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1740%
5−6
−1740%
Forza Horizon 5 80
+1900%
4−5
−1900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+1680%
5−6
−1680%
Valorant 160−170
+1689%
9−10
−1689%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 32
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Battlefield 5 89
+1680%
5−6
−1680%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+1700%
14−16
−1700%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
Dota 2 118
+1586%
7−8
−1586%
Far Cry 5 64
+2033%
3−4
−2033%
Fortnite 110−120
+1817%
6−7
−1817%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1740%
5−6
−1740%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+1620%
5−6
−1620%
Metro Exodus 49
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+1680%
5−6
−1680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+1925%
4−5
−1925%
Valorant 160−170
+1689%
9−10
−1689%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+1975%
4−5
−1975%
Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+1600%
2−3
−1600%
Dota 2 112
+1767%
6−7
−1767%
Far Cry 5 61
+1933%
3−4
−1933%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+1740%
5−6
−1740%
Forza Horizon 5 55
+1733%
3−4
−1733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+1680%
5−6
−1680%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+2200%
2−3
−2200%
Valorant 160−170
+1689%
9−10
−1689%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+1817%
6−7
−1817%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+1711%
9−10
−1711%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+2300%
2−3
−2300%
Metro Exodus 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+1650%
10−11
−1650%
Valorant 200−210
+1567%
12−14
−1567%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+2100%
3−4
−2100%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Far Cry 5 49
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+1867%
3−4
−1867%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+1950%
2−3
−1950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+1800%
2−3
−1800%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+1733%
3−4
−1733%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+2100%
2−3
−2100%
Metro Exodus 17
+1600%
1−2
−1600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Valorant 130−140
+1575%
8−9
−1575%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35
+1650%
2−3
−1650%
Counter-Strike 2 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6 0−1
Dota 2 62
+1967%
3−4
−1967%
Far Cry 5 19
+1800%
1−2
−1800%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+1900%
2−3
−1900%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and HD 6610M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2033% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2250% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 2900% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.99 1.44
Recency 11 May 2021 4 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 26 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 1566% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 400% more advanced lithography process.

HD 6610M, on the other hand, has 130.8% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon HD 6610M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
AMD Radeon HD 6610M
Radeon HD 6610M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1451 vote

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1 vote

Rate Radeon HD 6610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or Radeon HD 6610M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.