Quadro M620 vs GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile with Quadro M620, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 60 Watt
21.12
+242%

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile outperforms M620 by a whopping 242% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking241561
Place by popularity59not in top-100
Power efficiency27.8916.32
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGN20-P0GM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)11 January 2017 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2048512
Core clock speed1238 MHz756 MHz
Boost clock speed1500 MHz977 MHz
Number of transistorsno data1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt (35 - 80 Watt TGP)30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data31.26
Floating-point processing powerno data1 TFLOPS
ROPsno data16
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataMXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data80 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
3D Stereono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_212
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.5
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan-1.1.126
CUDA-5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 21.12
+242%
Quadro M620 6.18

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 15712
+313%
Quadro M620 3801

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 43216
+151%
Quadro M620 17237

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 11949
+282%
Quadro M620 3130

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 65252
+195%
Quadro M620 22120

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile 4497
+422%
Quadro M620 862

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD62
+138%
26
−138%
1440p43
+258%
12−14
−258%
4K26
+160%
10
−160%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 71
+344%
16−18
−344%
Counter-Strike 2 170
+415%
30−35
−415%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+371%
14−16
−371%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 54
+238%
16−18
−238%
Battlefield 5 93
+221%
27−30
−221%
Counter-Strike 2 125
+279%
30−35
−279%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+271%
14−16
−271%
Far Cry 5 68
+224%
21−24
−224%
Fortnite 110−120
+180%
40−45
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+207%
30−33
−207%
Forza Horizon 5 87
+358%
18−20
−358%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+256%
24−27
−256%
Valorant 160−170
+121%
70−75
−121%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 32
+100%
16−18
−100%
Battlefield 5 89
+207%
27−30
−207%
Counter-Strike 2 36
+9.1%
30−35
−9.1%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+131%
100−110
−131%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+193%
14−16
−193%
Dota 2 118
+123%
50−55
−123%
Far Cry 5 64
+205%
21−24
−205%
Fortnite 110−120
+180%
40−45
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+207%
30−33
−207%
Forza Horizon 5 77
+305%
18−20
−305%
Grand Theft Auto V 86
+258%
24−27
−258%
Metro Exodus 49
+277%
12−14
−277%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+256%
24−27
−256%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+326%
19
−326%
Valorant 160−170
+121%
70−75
−121%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 83
+186%
27−30
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+143%
14−16
−143%
Dota 2 112
+111%
50−55
−111%
Far Cry 5 61
+190%
21−24
−190%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+207%
30−33
−207%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 85−90
+256%
24−27
−256%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 46
+360%
10
−360%
Valorant 160−170
+121%
70−75
−121%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+180%
40−45
−180%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+355%
10−12
−355%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+213%
50−55
−213%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+500%
8−9
−500%
Metro Exodus 29
+383%
6−7
−383%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+346%
35−40
−346%
Valorant 200−210
+163%
75−80
−163%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+450%
12−14
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+260%
5−6
−260%
Far Cry 5 49
+277%
12−14
−277%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+269%
16−18
−269%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+280%
10−11
−280%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+293%
14−16
−293%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Grand Theft Auto V 44
+144%
18−20
−144%
Metro Exodus 17
+750%
2−3
−750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 29
+480%
5−6
−480%
Valorant 130−140
+294%
30−35
−294%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35
+483%
6−7
−483%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+283%
6−7
−283%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+200%
2−3
−200%
Dota 2 62
+158%
24−27
−158%
Far Cry 5 19
+171%
7−8
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+300%
10−11
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+243%
7−8
−243%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 24−27
+257%
7−8
−257%

This is how RTX 3050 4GB Mobile and Quadro M620 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 138% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 258% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 160% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is 750% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 3050 4GB Mobile surpassed Quadro M620 in all 61 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.12 6.18
Recency 11 May 2021 11 January 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 30 Watt

RTX 3050 4GB Mobile has a 241.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro M620, on the other hand, has 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M620 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M620 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile
GeForce RTX 3050 4GB
NVIDIA Quadro M620
Quadro M620

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1493 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 196 votes

Rate Quadro M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3050 4GB Mobile or Quadro M620, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.