Radeon RX 6850M XT vs GeForce RTX 2080

Place in the ranking	64	75
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	27.81	no data
Power efficiency	16.18	19.60
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU104	Navi 22
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	20 September 2018 (6 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$699	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2944	2560
Core clock speed	1515 MHz	2321 MHz
Boost clock speed	1710 MHz	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	165 Watt
Texture fill rate	314.6	413.0
Floating-point processing power	10.07 TFLOPS	13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	184	160
Tensor Cores	368	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	46	40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	384.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	No outputs
HDMI	+	-
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 48.70
+7.6%

RX 6850M XT 45.28

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 18794
+7.6%

RX 6850M XT 17473

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2080 40278

RX 6850M XT 42016
+4.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2080 17810

RX 6850M XT 33901
+90.3%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2080 143576

RX 6850M XT 172972
+20.5%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	142 −0.7%	143 +0.7%
1440p	98 +10.1%	89 −10.1%
4K	74 +19.4%	62 −19.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

85−90

−79.8%

160
+79.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	105 +11.7%	90−95 −11.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	98 −62.2%	159 +62.2%
Battlefield 5	194 +36.6%	140−150 −36.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	132 +48.3%	85−90 −48.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 −52.8%	136 +52.8%
Far Cry 5	127 +36.6%	90−95 −36.6%
Far Cry New Dawn	165 +51.4%	100−110 −51.4%
Forza Horizon 4	262 +29.1%	200−210 −29.1%
Hitman 3	135 +42.1%	95−100 −42.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	263 +46.1%	180−190 −46.1%
Metro Exodus	144 +5.1%	130−140 −5.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	109 +9%	100−105 −9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	215 +28%	160−170 −28%
Watch Dogs: Legion	253 +87.4%	130−140 −87.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	153 +62.8%	90−95 −62.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	83 −56.6%	130 +56.6%
Battlefield 5	182 +28.2%	140−150 −28.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	117 +31.5%	85−90 −31.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 −19.1%	106 +19.1%
Far Cry 5	102 +9.7%	90−95 −9.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	126 +15.6%	100−110 −15.6%
Forza Horizon 4	243 +19.7%	200−210 −19.7%
Hitman 3	131 +37.9%	95−100 −37.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	254 +41.1%	180−190 −41.1%
Metro Exodus	144 +5.1%	130−140 −5.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	117 +17%	100−105 −17%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 −38.5%	259 +38.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	100−110 +9.8%	90−95 −9.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	243 +80%	130−140 −80%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	68 −38.2%	90−95 +38.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	73 −53.4%	112 +53.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90 +1.1%	85−90 −1.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	85−90 +2.3%	87 −2.3%
Far Cry 5	81 −14.8%	90−95 +14.8%
Forza Horizon 4	132 −53.8%	200−210 +53.8%
Hitman 3	115 +21.1%	95−100 −21.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	169 −6.5%	180−190 +6.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	180−190 −21.4%	227 +21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	106 −15.1%	122 +15.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	79 −5.1%	83 +5.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−1%

100−105
+1%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	123 +39.8%	85−90 −39.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	88 +29.4%	65−70 −29.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	58 +18.4%	45−50 −18.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60 −41.7%	85 +41.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	69 +30.2%	50−55 −30.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −27.9%	55 +27.9%
Far Cry 5	70 +34.6%	50−55 −34.6%
Forza Horizon 4	212 −14.2%	240−250 +14.2%
Hitman 3	80 +35.6%	55−60 −35.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	129 +30.3%	95−100 −30.3%
Metro Exodus	89 +8.5%	80−85 −8.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −33.9%	166 +33.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 +13.2%	65−70 −13.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	239 +16%	200−210 −16%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

95
+23.4%

75−80

−23.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	66 +43.5%	45−50 −43.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	50 +28.2%	35−40 −28.2%
Hitman 3	48 +29.7%	35−40 −29.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	117 −67.5%	190−200 +67.5%
Metro Exodus	82 +39%	55−60 −39%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	76 +5.6%	72 −5.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	41 +32.3%	30−35 −32.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 −23.7%	47 +23.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	38 +31%	27−30 −31%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −36.8%	26 +36.8%
Far Cry 5	39 +44.4%	27−30 −44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	81 +28.6%	60−65 −28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	70−75 −31.4%	92 +31.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35 +45.8%	24−27 −45.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

59
+43.9%

40−45

−43.9%

This is how RTX 2080 and RX 6850M XT compete in popular games:

RX 6850M XT is 1% faster in 1080p
RTX 2080 is 10% faster in 1440p
RTX 2080 is 19% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2080 is 87% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6850M XT is 80% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2080 is ahead in 49 tests (68%)
RX 6850M XT is ahead in 23 tests (32%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	48.70	45.28
Recency	20 September 2018	4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	215 Watt	165 Watt

RTX 2080 has a 7.6% higher aggregate performance score.

RX 6850M XT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 30.3% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2080 and Radeon RX 6850M XT.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6850M XT is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.