RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile with RTX 2000 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2080 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
38.61

RTX 2000 Ada Generation outperforms RTX 2080 Mobile by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11478
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data88.57
Power efficiency18.0844.49
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameTU104BAD107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date29 January 2019 (6 years ago)12 February 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$649

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores29442816
Core clock speed1380 MHz1620 MHz
Boost clock speed1590 MHz2130 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate292.6187.4
Floating-point processing power9.362 TFLOPS12 TFLOPS
ROPs6448
TMUs18488
Tensor Cores36888
Ray Tracing Cores4622

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.9
DLSS++

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD145
−10.3%
160−170
+10.3%
1440p98
−12.2%
110−120
+12.2%
4K67
−11.9%
75−80
+11.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data4.06
1440pno data5.90
4Kno data8.65

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
−10.1%
120−130
+10.1%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−14.5%
95−100
+14.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−11.8%
95−100
+11.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
−10.1%
120−130
+10.1%
Battlefield 5 132
−13.6%
150−160
+13.6%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−14.5%
95−100
+14.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−11.8%
95−100
+11.8%
Far Cry 5 104
−5.8%
110−120
+5.8%
Fortnite 206
−11.7%
230−240
+11.7%
Forza Horizon 4 147
−8.8%
160−170
+8.8%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−11.1%
120−130
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 243
−11.1%
270−280
+11.1%
Valorant 276
−8.7%
300−310
+8.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−110
−10.1%
120−130
+10.1%
Battlefield 5 118
−10.2%
130−140
+10.2%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−14.5%
95−100
+14.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−7.9%
300−310
+7.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−11.8%
95−100
+11.8%
Dota 2 131
−14.5%
150−160
+14.5%
Far Cry 5 97
−13.4%
110−120
+13.4%
Fortnite 169
−12.4%
190−200
+12.4%
Forza Horizon 4 145
−10.3%
160−170
+10.3%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−11.1%
120−130
+11.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 101
−8.9%
110−120
+8.9%
Metro Exodus 90
−11.1%
100−105
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 214
−12.1%
240−250
+12.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 174
−9.2%
190−200
+9.2%
Valorant 266
−12.8%
300−310
+12.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 117
−11.1%
130−140
+11.1%
Counter-Strike 2 80−85
−14.5%
95−100
+14.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
−11.8%
95−100
+11.8%
Dota 2 125
−12%
140−150
+12%
Far Cry 5 96
−14.6%
110−120
+14.6%
Forza Horizon 4 139
−7.9%
150−160
+7.9%
Forza Horizon 5 100−110
−11.1%
120−130
+11.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 174
−9.2%
190−200
+9.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
−5.3%
100−105
+5.3%
Valorant 205
−12.2%
230−240
+12.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 155
−9.7%
170−180
+9.7%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
−11.6%
280−290
+11.6%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
−9.6%
80−85
+9.6%
Metro Exodus 55
−9.1%
60−65
+9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−14.3%
200−210
+14.3%
Valorant 260
−11.5%
290−300
+11.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 115
−13%
130−140
+13%
Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−7.1%
45−50
+7.1%
Far Cry 5 82
−9.8%
90−95
+9.8%
Forza Horizon 4 122
−14.8%
140−150
+14.8%
Forza Horizon 5 65−70
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
−10.3%
75−80
+10.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 124
−12.9%
140−150
+12.9%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80
−9%
85−90
+9%
Metro Exodus 35
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65
−7.7%
70−75
+7.7%
Valorant 240
−12.5%
270−280
+12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 68
−10.3%
75−80
+10.3%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−10.5%
21−24
+10.5%
Dota 2 119
−9.2%
130−140
+9.2%
Far Cry 5 52
−5.8%
55−60
+5.8%
Forza Horizon 4 82
−9.8%
90−95
+9.8%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
−12.5%
45−50
+12.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 61
−14.8%
70−75
+14.8%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 61
−14.8%
70−75
+14.8%

This is how RTX 2080 Mobile and RTX 2000 Ada Generation compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 10% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 12% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2000 Ada Generation is 12% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 38.61 44.35
Recency 29 January 2019 12 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 70 Watt

RTX 2000 Ada Generation has a 14.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 140% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile is a notebook card while RTX 2000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2080
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
RTX 2000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 147 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 29 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile or RTX 2000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.