Radeon RX 6900 XT vs GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q

Place in the ranking	134	22
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	29.88
Power efficiency	31.24	16.14
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU104	Navi 21
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)	28 October 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3072	5120
Core clock speed	735 MHz	1825 MHz
Boost clock speed	1080 MHz	2250 MHz
Number of transistors	13,600 million	26,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	300 Watt
Texture fill rate	207.4	720.0
Floating-point processing power	6.636 TFLOPS	23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	128
TMUs	192	320
Tensor Cores	384	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	48	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	267 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1375 MHz	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	352.0 GB/s	512.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.140	1.2
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 35.84

RX 6900 XT 69.45
+93.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 13827

RX 6900 XT 26791
+93.8%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 29637

RX 6900 XT 59119
+99.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q 21903

RX 6900 XT 50587
+131%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	110 −77.3%	195 +77.3%
1440p	71 −76.1%	125 +76.1%
4K	45 −75.6%	79 +75.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	5.12
1440p	no data	7.99
4K	no data	12.65

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

60−65

−118%

130−140
+118%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	90 −30%	117 +30%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −173%	169 +173%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −91.4%	220−230 +91.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	96 −24%	110−120 +24%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −118%	130−140 +118%
Far Cry 5	119 +1.7%	110−120 −1.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	152 −11.8%	170−180 +11.8%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −30.1%	230−240 +30.1%
Hitman 3	75−80 −69.7%	120−130 +69.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −65.4%	250−260 +65.4%
Metro Exodus	195 +25.8%	150−160 −25.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 −22%	120−130 +22%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −127%	290−300 +127%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −22.6%	150−160 +22.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	75−80 −262%	279 +262%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −129%	142 +129%
Battlefield 5	110−120 −91.4%	220−230 +91.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	88 −35.2%	110−120 +35.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −118%	130−140 +118%
Far Cry 5	100 −17%	110−120 +17%
Far Cry New Dawn	109 −56%	170−180 +56%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −30.1%	230−240 +30.1%
Hitman 3	75−80 −69.7%	120−130 +69.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	150−160 −65.4%	250−260 +65.4%
Metro Exodus	156 +0.6%	150−160 −0.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	85 −43.5%	120−130 +43.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −127%	290−300 +127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	70−75 −101%	140−150 +101%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 −22.6%	150−160 +22.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	56 −75%	98 +75%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	60−65 −121%	137 +121%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	66 −80.3%	110−120 +80.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	60−65 −118%	130−140 +118%
Far Cry 5	72 −62.5%	110−120 +62.5%
Forza Horizon 4	180−190 −35.5%	248 +35.5%
Hitman 3	75−80 −69.7%	120−130 +69.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	118 −140%	283 +140%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	120−130 −127%	290−300 +127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	88 −86.4%	164 +86.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	120−130 +2.5%	121 −2.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−31.2%

120−130
+31.2%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −143%	160−170 +143%
Far Cry New Dawn	74 −50%	110−120 +50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	53 −86.8%	99 +86.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 −179%	109 +179%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	51 −58.8%	80−85 +58.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −174%	70−75 +174%
Far Cry 5	56 −46.4%	80−85 +46.4%
Forza Horizon 4	200−210 −32.8%	270−280 +32.8%
Hitman 3	45−50 −124%	100−110 +124%
Horizon Zero Dawn	89 −152%	224 +152%
Metro Exodus	75 −56%	117 +56%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	85−90 −132%	190−200 +132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −152%	120−130 +152%
Watch Dogs: Legion	180−190 −31.3%	230−240 +31.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−54.1%

110−120
+54.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	35−40 −142%	85−90 +142%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 −68.3%	65−70 +68.3%
Hitman 3	27−30 −186%	83 +186%
Horizon Zero Dawn	170−180 −32.2%	220−230 +32.2%
Metro Exodus	65 −69.2%	110−120 +69.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	54 −126%	122 +126%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	32 −113%	68 +113%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −200%	66 +200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30 −70%	50−55 +70%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 −218%	35−40 +218%
Far Cry 5	32 −56.3%	50−55 +56.3%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −231%	162 +231%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −129%	110−120 +129%
Watch Dogs: Legion	18−20 −200%	54 +200%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−87.5%

75−80
+87.5%

This is how RTX 2080 Super Max-Q and RX 6900 XT compete in popular games:

RX 6900 XT is 77% faster in 1080p
RX 6900 XT is 76% faster in 1440p
RX 6900 XT is 76% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2080 Super Max-Q is 26% faster.
in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6900 XT is 262% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
RX 6900 XT is ahead in 68 tests (94%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	35.84	69.45
Recency	2 April 2020	28 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	80 Watt	300 Watt

RTX 2080 Super Max-Q has 275% lower power consumption.

RX 6900 XT, on the other hand, has a 93.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6900 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q is a notebook card while Radeon RX 6900 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.