Quadro T2000 Mobile vs GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile with Quadro T2000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Mobile
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 115 Watt
34.68
+67.5%

RTX 2070 Mobile outperforms T2000 Mobile by an impressive 68% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking147263
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency21.0324.06
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU106BTU117
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date29 January 2019 (5 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores23041024
Core clock speed1305 MHz1575 MHz
Boost clock speed1485 MHz1785 MHz
Number of transistors10,800 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt60 Watt
Texture fill rate213.8114.2
Floating-point processing power6.843 TFLOPS3.656 TFLOPS
ROPs6432
TMUs14464
Tensor Cores288no data
Ray Tracing Cores36no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Mobile 34.68
+67.5%
T2000 Mobile 20.70

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2070 Mobile 26005
+92.3%
T2000 Mobile 13524

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD119
+70%
70−75
−70%
1440p73
+82.5%
40−45
−82.5%
4K45
+87.5%
24−27
−87.5%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 100
+117%
45−50
−117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 81
+131%
35−40
−131%
Battlefield 5 142
+109%
65−70
−109%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 106
+152%
40−45
−152%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%
Far Cry 5 125
+160%
45−50
−160%
Far Cry New Dawn 127
+131%
55−60
−131%
Forza Horizon 4 382
+201%
120−130
−201%
Hitman 3 100
+144%
40−45
−144%
Horizon Zero Dawn 234
+136%
95−100
−136%
Metro Exodus 143
+101%
70−75
−101%
Red Dead Redemption 2 106
+92.7%
55−60
−92.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 186
+170%
65−70
−170%
Watch Dogs: Legion 223
+140%
90−95
−140%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 112
+143%
45−50
−143%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
+97.1%
35−40
−97.1%
Battlefield 5 127
+86.8%
65−70
−86.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 94
+124%
40−45
−124%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%
Far Cry 5 97
+102%
45−50
−102%
Far Cry New Dawn 93
+69.1%
55−60
−69.1%
Forza Horizon 4 287
+126%
120−130
−126%
Hitman 3 96
+134%
40−45
−134%
Horizon Zero Dawn 230
+132%
95−100
−132%
Metro Exodus 130
+83.1%
70−75
−83.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 86
+56.4%
55−60
−56.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 149
+116%
65−70
−116%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200
+335%
45−50
−335%
Watch Dogs: Legion 211
+127%
90−95
−127%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 58
+26.1%
45−50
−26.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 59
+68.6%
35−40
−68.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 69
+64.3%
40−45
−64.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+63.6%
30−35
−63.6%
Far Cry 5 73
+52.1%
45−50
−52.1%
Forza Horizon 4 94
−35.1%
120−130
+35.1%
Hitman 3 80
+95.1%
40−45
−95.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 114
+15.2%
95−100
−15.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 125
+81.2%
65−70
−81.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74
+60.9%
45−50
−60.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 56
−66.1%
90−95
+66.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+67.3%
55−60
−67.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 78
+95%
40−45
−95%
Far Cry New Dawn 64
+100%
30−35
−100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+129%
21−24
−129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 47
+147%
18−20
−147%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 52
+126%
21−24
−126%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%
Far Cry 5 52
+117%
24−27
−117%
Forza Horizon 4 277
+139%
110−120
−139%
Hitman 3 56
+133%
24−27
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+107%
40−45
−107%
Metro Exodus 74
+89.7%
35−40
−89.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70−75
+72.1%
40−45
−72.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+79.2%
24−27
−79.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 206
+70.2%
120−130
−70.2%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 73
+115%
30−35
−115%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 39
+95%
20−22
−95%
Far Cry New Dawn 36
+125%
16−18
−125%
Hitman 3 36
+125%
16−18
−125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 101
−5.9%
100−110
+5.9%
Metro Exodus 45
+105%
21−24
−105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+138%
21−24
−138%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 31
+158%
12−14
−158%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 28
+155%
10−12
−155%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29
+164%
10−12
−164%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 26
+136%
10−12
−136%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+57.1%
27−30
−57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+75%
24−27
−75%
Watch Dogs: Legion 23
+156%
9−10
−156%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 37
+106%
18−20
−106%

This is how RTX 2070 Mobile and T2000 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Mobile is 70% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Mobile is 83% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Mobile is 88% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2070 Mobile is 335% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T2000 Mobile is 66% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Mobile is ahead in 69 tests (96%)
  • T2000 Mobile is ahead in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 34.68 20.70
Recency 29 January 2019 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 60 Watt

RTX 2070 Mobile has a 67.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T2000 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months, and 91.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T2000 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro T2000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
Quadro T2000 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 473 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 382 votes

Rate Quadro T2000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.