GeForce MX350 vs RTX 2070 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2070 Super with GeForce MX350, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2070 Super
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 215 Watt
47.29
+548%

RTX 2070 Super outperforms MX350 by a whopping 548% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking71538
Place by popularity80not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation41.47no data
Power efficiency15.0825.02
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameTU104GP107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 July 2019 (5 years ago)10 February 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560640
Core clock speed1605 MHz747 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz937 MHz
Number of transistors13,600 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)215 Watt20 Watt
Texture fill rate283.229.98
Floating-point processing power9.062 TFLOPS1.199 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs16032
Tensor Cores320no data
Ray Tracing Cores40no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s56.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-CNo outputs
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA7.56.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2070 Super 47.29
+548%
GeForce MX350 7.30

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2070 Super 18222
+548%
GeForce MX350 2811

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2070 Super 34964
+467%
GeForce MX350 6166

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2070 Super 24640
+464%
GeForce MX350 4371

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 Super 131200
+430%
GeForce MX350 24744

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

RTX 2070 Super 99291
+636%
GeForce MX350 13490

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2070 Super 521878
+83%
GeForce MX350 285166

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

RTX 2070 Super 98404
+607%
GeForce MX350 13921

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

RTX 2070 Super 107983
+759%
GeForce MX350 12572

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD132
+408%
26
−408%
1440p80
+158%
31
−158%
4K49
+96%
25
−96%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.78no data
1440p6.24no data
4K10.18no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 94
+683%
12−14
−683%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 104
+373%
22
−373%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 88
+577%
13
−577%
Battlefield 5 183
+771%
21−24
−771%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 119
+526%
19
−526%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+600%
12−14
−600%
Far Cry 5 149
+473%
26
−473%
Far Cry New Dawn 158
+351%
35
−351%
Forza Horizon 4 277
+477%
45−50
−477%
Hitman 3 116
+480%
20
−480%
Horizon Zero Dawn 279
+116%
129
−116%
Metro Exodus 144
+289%
37
−289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 122
+281%
32
−281%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 203
+746%
24−27
−746%
Watch Dogs: Legion 229
+141%
95
−141%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 172
+562%
26
−562%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 74
+1133%
6
−1133%
Battlefield 5 172
+719%
21−24
−719%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 120
+606%
17
−606%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+550%
12−14
−550%
Far Cry 5 120
+422%
23
−422%
Far Cry New Dawn 120
+380%
25
−380%
Forza Horizon 4 258
+438%
45−50
−438%
Hitman 3 113
+465%
20
−465%
Horizon Zero Dawn 270
+133%
116
−133%
Metro Exodus 144
+414%
28
−414%
Red Dead Redemption 2 92
+283%
24
−283%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 198
+692%
25
−692%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95−100
+341%
21−24
−341%
Watch Dogs: Legion 215
+144%
88
−144%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 65
+713%
8
−713%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+560%
10−11
−560%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 91
+1417%
6
−1417%
Cyberpunk 2077 73
+508%
12−14
−508%
Far Cry 5 83
+453%
15
−453%
Forza Horizon 4 153
+705%
19
−705%
Hitman 3 104
+512%
17
−512%
Horizon Zero Dawn 156
+680%
20
−680%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 167
+779%
19
−779%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100
+525%
16
−525%
Watch Dogs: Legion 68
+1033%
6
−1033%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 114
+470%
20
−470%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 118
+743%
14−16
−743%
Far Cry New Dawn 86
+682%
10−12
−682%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 57
+714%
7−8
−714%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 73
+943%
7−8
−943%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
+1467%
3−4
−1467%
Far Cry 5 66
+725%
8−9
−725%
Forza Horizon 4 255
+881%
24−27
−881%
Hitman 3 71
+545%
10−12
−545%
Horizon Zero Dawn 118
+687%
14−16
−687%
Metro Exodus 91
+1038%
8−9
−1038%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 123
+2360%
5−6
−2360%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+1133%
6−7
−1133%
Watch Dogs: Legion 215
+367%
45−50
−367%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 95
+692%
12−14
−692%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55
+817%
6−7
−817%
Far Cry New Dawn 48
+860%
5−6
−860%
Hitman 3 42
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Horizon Zero Dawn 129
+438%
24−27
−438%
Metro Exodus 78
+1460%
5−6
−1460%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 68
+1600%
4−5
−1600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 39
+875%
4−5
−875%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 32
+967%
3−4
−967%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 44
+1367%
3−4
−1367%
Cyberpunk 2077 23
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Far Cry 5 35
+775%
4−5
−775%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+950%
8−9
−950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 65
+3150%
2−3
−3150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 29
+1350%
2−3
−1350%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 59
+743%
7−8
−743%

This is how RTX 2070 Super and GeForce MX350 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super is 408% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 158% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super is 96% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 2070 Super is 3150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2070 Super surpassed GeForce MX350 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 47.29 7.30
Recency 9 July 2019 10 February 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 215 Watt 20 Watt

RTX 2070 Super has a 547.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce MX350, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 months, and 975% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX350 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2070 Super is a desktop card while GeForce MX350 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIA GeForce MX350
GeForce MX350

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 4963 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1626 votes

Rate GeForce MX350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.