Qualcomm Adreno 680 vs GeForce RTX 2060

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2060 with Qualcomm Adreno 680, including specs and performance data.

RTX 2060
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 160 Watt
36.71
+1584%

RTX 2060 outperforms Qualcomm Adreno 680 by a whopping 1584% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking131860
Place by popularity16not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation40.45no data
Power efficiency15.7321.35
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)no data
GPU code nameTU106no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date7 January 2019 (5 years ago)6 December 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$349 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920no data
Core clock speed1365 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1680 MHzno data
Number of transistors10,800 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt7 Watt
Texture fill rate201.6no data
Floating-point processing power6.451 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs120no data
Tensor Cores240no data
Ray Tracing Cores30no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount6 GBno data
Memory bus width192 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-Cno data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 36.71
+1584%
Qualcomm Adreno 680 2.18

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 14145
+1586%
Qualcomm Adreno 680 839

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2060 27163
+1303%
Qualcomm Adreno 680 1936

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD119
+1600%
7−8
−1600%
1440p77
+1825%
4−5
−1825%
4K47
+2250%
2−3
−2250%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.93no data
1440p4.53no data
4K7.43no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+1160%
5−6
−1160%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 92
+922%
9−10
−922%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 79
+7800%
1−2
−7800%
Battlefield 5 157
+3825%
4−5
−3825%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 106
+1414%
7−8
−1414%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+1160%
5−6
−1160%
Far Cry 5 114
+2180%
5−6
−2180%
Far Cry New Dawn 128
+1729%
7−8
−1729%
Forza Horizon 4 205
+1364%
14−16
−1364%
Hitman 3 98
+1125%
8−9
−1125%
Horizon Zero Dawn 248
+1081%
21−24
−1081%
Metro Exodus 144
+4700%
3−4
−4700%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+1457%
7−8
−1457%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 191
+1492%
12−14
−1492%
Watch Dogs: Legion 254
+568%
35−40
−568%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 131
+1356%
9−10
−1356%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 64
+6300%
1−2
−6300%
Battlefield 5 140
+3400%
4−5
−3400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 96
+1271%
7−8
−1271%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+1160%
5−6
−1160%
Far Cry 5 91
+1720%
5−6
−1720%
Far Cry New Dawn 95
+1257%
7−8
−1257%
Forza Horizon 4 194
+1286%
14−16
−1286%
Hitman 3 96
+1100%
8−9
−1100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 247
+1076%
21−24
−1076%
Metro Exodus 140
+4567%
3−4
−4567%
Red Dead Redemption 2 103
+1371%
7−8
−1371%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+1000%
12−14
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 75−80
+443%
14−16
−443%
Watch Dogs: Legion 244
+542%
35−40
−542%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+522%
9−10
−522%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 55
+5400%
1−2
−5400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71
+914%
7−8
−914%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+1160%
5−6
−1160%
Far Cry 5 70
+1300%
5−6
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 105
+650%
14−16
−650%
Hitman 3 81
+913%
8−9
−913%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120
+471%
21−24
−471%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 130−140
+1000%
12−14
−1000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+421%
14−16
−421%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45
+18.4%
35−40
−18.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 96
+1271%
7−8
−1271%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+1650%
4−5
−1650%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+1300%
4−5
−1300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+1850%
2−3
−1850%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+2000%
2−3
−2000%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+1300%
3−4
−1300%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+1633%
12−14
−1633%
Hitman 3 54
+575%
8−9
−575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 89
+1171%
7−8
−1171%
Metro Exodus 76
+1800%
4−5
−1800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+1640%
5−6
−1640%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 236
+1375%
16−18
−1375%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 74
+1133%
6−7
−1133%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40
+3900%
1−2
−3900%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+1750%
2−3
−1750%
Hitman 3 30−33
+2900%
1−2
−2900%
Horizon Zero Dawn 104
+1633%
6−7
−1633%
Metro Exodus 52
+1633%
3−4
−1633%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 51
+1600%
3−4
−1600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 28
+1300%
2−3
−1300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 28
+2700%
1−2
−2700%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 0−1
Far Cry 5 25
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Forza Horizon 4 59 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 38
+850%
4−5
−850%

This is how RTX 2060 and Qualcomm Adreno 680 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2060 is 1600% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2060 is 1825% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2060 is 2250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2060 is 7800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2060 surpassed Qualcomm Adreno 680 in all 60 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 36.71 2.18
Recency 7 January 2019 6 December 2018
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 7 Watt

RTX 2060 has a 1583.9% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 1 month.

Qualcomm Adreno 680, on the other hand, has a 71.4% more advanced lithography process, and 2185.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2060 is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm Adreno 680 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 2060 is a desktop card while Qualcomm Adreno 680 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
Qualcomm Adreno 680
Adreno 680

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 10393 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 38 votes

Rate Qualcomm Adreno 680 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.