Radeon RX 6750 GRE vs GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Place in the ranking	89	71
Place by popularity	15	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	45.91	44.04
Power efficiency	16.89	12.82
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	TU106	Navi 22
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	9 July 2019 (5 years ago)	17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$399	$549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 2060 Super has 4% better value for money than RX 6750 GRE.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2176	2560
Core clock speed	1470 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1650 MHz	2581 MHz
Number of transistors	10,800 million	17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	224.4	413.0
Floating-point processing power	7.181 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	136	160
Tensor Cores	272	no data
Ray Tracing Cores	34	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	229 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	1750 MHz	18 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	+	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.3
CUDA	7.5	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2060 Super 42.94

RX 6750 GRE 46.55
+8.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

RTX 2060 Super 16509

RX 6750 GRE 17895
+8.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	118 −1.7%	120−130 +1.7%
1440p	67 −4.5%	70−75 +4.5%
4K	43 −4.7%	45−50 +4.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	3.38 +35.3%	4.58 −35.3%
1440p	5.96 +31.7%	7.84 −31.7%
4K	9.28 +31.5%	12.20 −31.5%

RTX 2060 Super has 35% lower cost per frame in 1080p
RTX 2060 Super has 32% lower cost per frame in 1440p
RTX 2060 Super has 31% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	91 −4.4%	95−100 +4.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	88 −8%	95−100 +8%
Elden Ring	121 −7.4%	130−140 +7.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90 −5.6%	95−100 +5.6%
Counter-Strike 2	73 −2.7%	75−80 +2.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	77 −3.9%	80−85 +3.9%
Forza Horizon 4	228 −5.3%	240−250 +5.3%
Metro Exodus	127 −2.4%	130−140 +2.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	122 −6.6%	130−140 +6.6%
Valorant	202 −4%	210−220 +4%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	156 −2.6%	160−170 +2.6%
Counter-Strike 2	64 −1.6%	65−70 +1.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	67 −4.5%	70−75 +4.5%
Dota 2	159 −6.9%	170−180 +6.9%
Elden Ring	138 −1.4%	140−150 +1.4%
Far Cry 5	122 −6.6%	130−140 +6.6%
Fortnite	149 −7.4%	160−170 +7.4%
Forza Horizon 4	184 −3.3%	190−200 +3.3%
Grand Theft Auto V	139 −7.9%	150−160 +7.9%
Metro Exodus	91 −4.4%	95−100 +4.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	241 −7.9%	260−270 +7.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	59 −1.7%	60−65 +1.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 −3.2%	160−170 +3.2%
Valorant	105 −4.8%	110−120 +4.8%
World of Tanks	270−280 −7.5%	300−310 +7.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	82 −3.7%	85−90 +3.7%
Counter-Strike 2	59 −1.7%	60−65 +1.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	58 −3.4%	60−65 +3.4%
Dota 2	185 −8.1%	200−210 +8.1%
Far Cry 5	100−110 +1%	100−105 −1%
Forza Horizon 4	156 −2.6%	160−170 +2.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	127 −2.4%	130−140 +2.4%
Valorant	180 −5.6%	190−200 +5.6%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	86 −4.7%	90−95 +4.7%
Elden Ring	78 −2.6%	80−85 +2.6%
Grand Theft Auto V	86 −4.7%	90−95 +4.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −2.9%	180−190 +2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	38 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
World of Tanks	270−280 −7%	290−300 +7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	74 −8.1%	80−85 +8.1%
Counter-Strike 2	39 −2.6%	40−45 +2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	38 −5.3%	40−45 +5.3%
Far Cry 5	130−140 −1.4%	140−150 +1.4%
Forza Horizon 4	114 −5.3%	120−130 +5.3%
Metro Exodus	87 −3.4%	90−95 +3.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	75−80 −3.9%	80−85 +3.9%
Valorant	114 −5.3%	120−130 +5.3%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	23 −4.3%	24−27 +4.3%
Dota 2	83 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%
Elden Ring	34 −2.9%	35−40 +2.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	83 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%
Metro Exodus	31 +3.3%	30−33 −3.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	138 −1.4%	140−150 +1.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24 +0%	24−27 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	83 −2.4%	85−90 +2.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	42 −7.1%	45−50 +7.1%
Counter-Strike 2	45−50 +2.2%	45−50 −2.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	18 +0%	18−20 +0%
Dota 2	121 −7.4%	130−140 +7.4%
Far Cry 5	65−70 −6.1%	70−75 +6.1%
Fortnite	60−65 −3.2%	65−70 +3.2%
Forza Horizon 4	65 −7.7%	70−75 +7.7%
Valorant	59 −1.7%	60−65 +1.7%

This is how RTX 2060 Super and RX 6750 GRE compete in popular games:

RX 6750 GRE is 2% faster in 1080p
RX 6750 GRE is 4% faster in 1440p
RX 6750 GRE is 5% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	42.94	46.55
Recency	9 July 2019	17 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	12 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	175 Watt	250 Watt

RTX 2060 Super has 42.9% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 GRE, on the other hand, has a 8.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce RTX 2060 Super and Radeon RX 6750 GRE.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.