Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS vs GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 2050 Mobile
2021
4 GB GDDR6, 45 Watt
18.72
+75.6%

RTX 2050 Mobile outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking298435
Place by popularity17not in top-100
Power efficiency28.6424.46
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)no data
GPU code nameGA107no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 December 2021 (3 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481536
Core clock speed1185 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1477 MHz1250 MHz
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate94.53no data
Floating-point processing power6.05 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data
Tensor Cores256no data
Ray Tracing Cores32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1750 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth112.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4ano data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12_1
Shader Model6.6no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.3-
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 2050 Mobile 18.72
+75.6%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 10.66

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

RTX 2050 Mobile 12495
+96.9%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6346

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

RTX 2050 Mobile 8965
+42.4%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 6294

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

RTX 2050 Mobile 58257
+67%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 34890

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

RTX 2050 Mobile 3221
+88.1%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS 1712

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD42
+20%
35
−20%
1440p33
+94.1%
17
−94.1%
4K25
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 36
+56.5%
23
−56.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Elden Ring 43
+38.7%
30−35
−38.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30
+57.9%
19
−57.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 21
+110%
10−11
−110%
Forza Horizon 4 76
+52%
50
−52%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+75.9%
27−30
−75.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+57.1%
27−30
−57.1%
Valorant 87
+118%
40−45
−118%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+68.8%
16
−68.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Dota 2 85
+143%
35
−143%
Elden Ring 59
+90.3%
30−35
−90.3%
Far Cry 5 70
+62.8%
40−45
−62.8%
Fortnite 100−105
+61.3%
60−65
−61.3%
Forza Horizon 4 63
+50%
42
−50%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+97.1%
35
−97.1%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+75.9%
27−30
−75.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+58%
80−85
−58%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+57.1%
27−30
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+81.3%
30−35
−81.3%
Valorant 43
+7.5%
40−45
−7.5%
World of Tanks 220−230
+47.7%
150−160
−47.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+71.4%
35−40
−71.4%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+136%
14
−136%
Cyberpunk 2077 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Dota 2 110
+83.3%
60−65
−83.3%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+48.8%
40−45
−48.8%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+55.6%
36
−55.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+58%
80−85
−58%
Valorant 75−80
+90%
40−45
−90%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 37
+147%
15
−147%
Elden Ring 30−35
+107%
14−16
−107%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+147%
15
−147%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+75.8%
95−100
−75.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
World of Tanks 120−130
+68.4%
75−80
−68.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+81%
21−24
−81%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+77.8%
9
−77.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+113%
21−24
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+67.9%
28
−67.9%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+100%
21−24
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%
Valorant 45−50
+84.6%
24−27
−84.6%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Dota 2 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Elden Ring 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+80.6%
30−35
−80.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+100%
9−10
−100%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+150%
2−3
−150%
Dota 2 34
+88.9%
18−20
−88.9%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+84.6%
12−14
−84.6%
Fortnite 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Valorant 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%

This is how RTX 2050 Mobile and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 20% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 94% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2050 Mobile is 79% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 2050 Mobile is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 2050 Mobile surpassed Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.72 10.66
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 30 Watt

RTX 2050 Mobile has a 75.6% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2328 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 10 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 3.8 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.