Arc A380 vs GeForce MX570

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce MX570 with Arc A380, including specs and performance data.

GeForce MX570
2022
2 GB GDDR6, 25 Watt
14.88

Arc A380 outperforms MX570 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking355334
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.12
Power efficiency40.8014.75
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA107DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release dateMay 2022 (2 years ago)14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores20481024
Core clock speed832 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1155 MHz2050 MHz
Number of transistorsno data7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)25 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate73.92131.2
Floating-point processing power4.731 TFLOPS4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs4032
TMUs6464
Tensor Cores64128
Ray Tracing Cores168

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data222 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s186.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.3
CUDA8.6-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX570 14.88
Arc A380 16.14
+8.5%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX570 5735
Arc A380 6219
+8.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−17.5%
47
+17.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−79.4%
61
+79.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−108%
50
+108%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−102%
95−100
+102%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−103%
60−65
+103%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−91.4%
65−70
+91.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−85.4%
75−80
+85.4%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−70.8%
160−170
+70.8%
Hitman 3 27−30
−121%
60−65
+121%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−73.7%
130−140
+73.7%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−102%
100−110
+102%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−115%
100−110
+115%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−44.9%
110−120
+44.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
−112%
72
+112%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−54.2%
37
+54.2%
Battlefield 5 45−50
−102%
95−100
+102%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−103%
60−65
+103%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−91.4%
65−70
+91.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−85.4%
75−80
+85.4%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
−70.8%
160−170
+70.8%
Hitman 3 27−30
−121%
60−65
+121%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
−73.7%
130−140
+73.7%
Metro Exodus 50−55
−102%
100−110
+102%
Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−66.7%
80
+66.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−80%
60−65
+80%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−44.9%
110−120
+44.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30−35
+17.2%
29
−17.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
−29.2%
31
+29.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−33
−103%
60−65
+103%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−91.4%
65−70
+91.4%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+68.4%
57
−68.4%
Hitman 3 27−30
−121%
60−65
+121%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+46.2%
52
−46.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
−27.1%
61
+27.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+2.9%
34
−2.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+212%
25
−212%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
−82.9%
75−80
+82.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−93.1%
55−60
+93.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
−95.7%
45−50
+95.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
−107%
30−35
+107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
−158%
30−35
+158%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
−113%
30−35
+113%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−100%
30−35
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
−122%
170−180
+122%
Hitman 3 18−20
−100%
35−40
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−107%
60−65
+107%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−119%
55−60
+119%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
−152%
65−70
+152%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−144%
35−40
+144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 90−95
−75.8%
160−170
+75.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−108%
50−55
+108%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−107%
27−30
+107%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Hitman 3 10−12
−118%
24−27
+118%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
−101%
140−150
+101%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−143%
30−35
+143%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−111%
18−20
+111%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−143%
16−18
+143%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−113%
16−18
+113%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−105%
40−45
+105%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−171%
35−40
+171%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−133%
14−16
+133%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−100%
24−27
+100%

This is how GeForce MX570 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A380 is 18% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 212% faster.
  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Arc A380 is 171% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
  • Arc A380 is ahead in 61 test (92%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.88 16.14
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce MX570 has 200% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 8.5% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce MX570 and Arc A380.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
Intel Arc A380
Arc A380

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 93 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 836 votes

Rate Arc A380 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.