Arc A380 vs GeForce MX570

Place in the ranking	354	334
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	43.73
Power efficiency	41.03	14.88
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2024)	Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code name	GA107	DG2-128
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	May 2022 (2 years ago)	14 June 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1024
Core clock speed	832 MHz	2000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1155 MHz	2050 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	75 Watt
Texture fill rate	73.92	131.2
Floating-point processing power	4.731 TFLOPS	4.198 TFLOPS
ROPs	40	32
TMUs	64	64
Tensor Cores	64	128
Ray Tracing Cores	16	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x8	PCIe 4.0 x8
Length	no data	222 mm
Width	no data	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	96 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1937 MHz
Memory bandwidth	96 GB/s	186.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.6	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	3.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
CUDA	8.6	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce MX570 14.90

Arc A380 16.21
+8.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce MX570 5729

Arc A380 6233
+8.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−38.2%

47
+38.2%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

no data

3.17

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −80.8%	47 +80.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
Elden Ring	45−50 +0%	45 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −8.3%	50−55 +8.3%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −42.3%	37 +42.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −54.1%	94 +54.1%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −53.7%	63 +53.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −8.3%	35−40 +8.3%
Valorant	55−60 −10.2%	65−70 +10.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −8.3%	50−55 +8.3%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −19.2%	31 +19.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
Dota 2	12 −175%	33 +175%
Elden Ring	45−50 −11.1%	50−55 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	68 +6.3%	64 −6.3%
Fortnite	80−85 −7.2%	85−90 +7.2%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −31.1%	80 +31.1%
Grand Theft Auto V	50−55 +60.6%	33 −60.6%
Metro Exodus	40−45 −7.3%	44 +7.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −7.5%	110−120 +7.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35−40 −8.3%	35−40 +8.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −11.1%	50−55 +11.1%
Valorant	55−60 −10.2%	65−70 +10.2%
World of Tanks	190−200 −5.7%	200−210 +5.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	45−50 −8.3%	50−55 +8.3%
Counter-Strike 2	24−27 −3.8%	27 +3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077	27−30 −3.4%	30−33 +3.4%
Dota 2	50−55 −1.9%	55−60 +1.9%
Far Cry 5	55−60 −5.5%	55−60 +5.5%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 +0%	61 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 −7.5%	110−120 +7.5%
Valorant	55−60 −10.2%	65−70 +10.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	21−24 −14.3%	24−27 +14.3%
Elden Ring	21−24 −8.7%	24−27 +8.7%
Grand Theft Auto V	21−24 −9.1%	24−27 +9.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	130−140 −13.6%	150−160 +13.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
World of Tanks	100−110 −7.7%	110−120 +7.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−33 −10%	30−35 +10%
Counter-Strike 2	12−14 −7.7%	14−16 +7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−12 +10%	10−11 −10%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −11.1%	40−45 +11.1%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −12.5%	35−40 +12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −10.5%	21−24 +10.5%
Valorant	35−40 −10.8%	40−45 +10.8%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Dota 2	24−27 −7.7%	27−30 +7.7%
Elden Ring	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Grand Theft Auto V	24−27 −7.7%	27−30 +7.7%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	40−45 −9.1%	45−50 +9.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −7.7%	27−30 +7.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Dota 2	24−27 −3.8%	27−30 +3.8%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −5.3%	20−22 +5.3%
Fortnite	16−18 −11.8%	18−20 +11.8%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Valorant	16−18 −12.5%	18−20 +12.5%

This is how GeForce MX570 and Arc A380 compete in popular games:

Arc A380 is 38% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 61% faster.
in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A380 is 175% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GeForce MX570 is ahead in 2 tests (4%)
Arc A380 is ahead in 50 tests (91%)
there's a draw in 3 tests (5%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	14.90	16.21
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	6 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	25 Watt	75 Watt

GeForce MX570 has 200% lower power consumption.

Arc A380, on the other hand, has a 8.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 33.3% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce MX570 and Arc A380.

Be aware that GeForce MX570 is a notebook card while Arc A380 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.