GeForce MX570 vs Go 7950 GTX

Go 7200 Go 7300 Go 7400 Go 7600 Go 7700 Go 7900 GS Go 7900 GS SLI Go 7900 GTX Go 7900 GTX SLI Go 7900 SE Go 7950 GTX Go 7950 GTX SLI
VS
MX110 MX130 MX150 MX150 GP107 MX230 MX250 MX330 MX350 MX450 MX550 MX570 MX570 A

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce Go 7950 GTX and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Go 7950 GTX
2006
512 MB GDDR3, 45 Watt
0.68

MX570 outperforms Go 7950 GTX by a whopping 2087% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Go 7950 GTX Go 7950 GTX
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1175353
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.0541.48
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameG71GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 October 2006 (18 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores322048
Core clock speed575 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed575 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate13.8073.92
Floating-point processing powerno data4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs1640
TMUs2464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB2 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Go 7950 GTX 0.68
GeForce MX570 14.87
+2087%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Go 7950 GTX 263
GeForce MX570 5735
+2081%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−591%
75−80
+591%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 40−45
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−160%
75−80
+160%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4000%
40−45
+4000%
Hitman 3 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−591%
75−80
+591%
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 40−45
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−160%
75−80
+160%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−750%
30−35
+750%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−667%
21−24
+667%
Hitman 3 5−6
−460%
27−30
+460%
Horizon Zero Dawn 10−12
−591%
75−80
+591%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
−700%
45−50
+700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−250%
35−40
+250%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−33
−160%
75−80
+160%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 40−45

1440p
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−2200%
21−24
+2200%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 14−16
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−1600%
16−18
+1600%
Hitman 3 6−7
−200%
18−20
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−4450%
90−95
+4450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 10−12

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 7−8

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−550%
12−14
+550%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Metro Exodus 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hitman 3 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 4450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 35 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 31 test (47%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.68 14.87
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 25 Watt

GeForce MX570 has a 2086.8% higher aggregate performance score, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1025% more advanced lithography process, and 80% lower power consumption.

The GeForce MX570 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 7950 GTX in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce Go 7950 GTX
GeForce Go 7950 GTX
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Go 7950 GTX GeForce Go 7950 GTX
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3850 Mobility Radeon HD 3850
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
vs
Radeon 760M Radeon 760M
Go 7950 GTX GeForce Go 7950 GTX
vs
HD 7400G Radeon HD 7400G
GT 240M GeForce GT 240M
vs
GT 555M 2 GB GeForce GT 555M 2 GB
GT 240M GeForce GT 240M
vs
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
Go 7950 GTX GeForce Go 7950 GTX
vs
GeForce 720M GeForce 720M
Go 7950 GTX GeForce Go 7950 GTX
vs
RX 6700 Radeon RX 6700
Go 7950 GTX GeForce Go 7950 GTX
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
Go 7950 GTX GeForce Go 7950 GTX
vs
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
Go 7950 GTX GeForce Go 7950 GTX
vs
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
FX 3500M Quadro FX 3500M
vs
RTX 3060 GeForce RTX 3060
8700M GT SLI GeForce 8700M GT SLI
vs
RTX 4070 GeForce RTX 4070
8700M GT SLI GeForce 8700M GT SLI
vs
Arc A770M Arc A770M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.3 3 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7950 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 92 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.