Radeon RX 6650M vs GeForce GTX 980 Mobile

Place in the ranking	257	117
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	19.85	no data
Power efficiency	7.43	22.39
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	GM204	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	21 September 2015 (9 years ago)	4 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$395.82	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2048	1792
Core clock speed	1064 MHz	2068 MHz
Boost clock speed	1216 MHz	2416 MHz
Number of transistors	5,200 million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100-200 Watt	120 Watt
Texture fill rate	136.2	270.6
Floating-point processing power	4.358 TFLOPS	8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	128	112
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7.0 GB/s	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	224 GB/s	256.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 displays	no data
VGA аnalog display support	+	no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	+	no data
HDMI	+	-
HDCP	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
G-SYNC support	+	-
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream	+	-
GeForce ShadowPlay	+	-
GPU Boost	2.0	no data
GameWorks	+	-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	+	-
Optimus	+	-
BatteryBoost	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Mobile 21.60

RX 6650M 39.03
+80.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 980 Mobile 17201

RX 6650M 32846
+91%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980 Mobile 13047

RX 6650M 25739
+97.3%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	97 −19.6%	116 +19.6%
4K	48 −77.1%	85−90 +77.1%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.08	no data
4K	8.25	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −108%	80−85 +108%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −195%	127 +195%
Elden Ring	65−70 +0%	69 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −52.9%	100−110 +52.9%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −108%	80−85 +108%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 −23.3%	53 +23.3%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −141%	222 +141%
Metro Exodus	55−60 −62.1%	90−95 +62.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −57.1%	75−80 +57.1%
Valorant	85−90 −79.3%	150−160 +79.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −52.9%	100−110 +52.9%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −108%	80−85 +108%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +10.3%	39 −10.3%
Dota 2	56 +43.6%	39 −43.6%
Elden Ring	65−70 −98.6%	130−140 +98.6%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +52.2%	46 −52.2%
Fortnite	110−120 −52.7%	170−180 +52.7%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −107%	190 +107%
Grand Theft Auto V	84 −45.2%	120−130 +45.2%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +75.8%	33 −75.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 −40.8%	200−210 +40.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45−50 −57.1%	75−80 +57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	81 −70.4%	130−140 +70.4%
Valorant	85−90 −79.3%	150−160 +79.3%
World of Tanks	240−250 −15.8%	270−280 +15.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 −52.9%	100−110 +52.9%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 −108%	80−85 +108%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +34.4%	32 −34.4%
Dota 2	75−80 −31.6%	100 +31.6%
Far Cry 5	70−75 −38.6%	95−100 +38.6%
Forza Horizon 4	90−95 −81.5%	167 +81.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	140−150 −40.8%	200−210 +40.8%
Valorant	85−90 −79.3%	150−160 +79.3%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	35−40 −106%	70−75 +106%
Elden Ring	35−40 −114%	75−80 +114%
Grand Theft Auto V	35−40 −106%	70−75 +106%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 −1.2%	170−180 +1.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20−22 −95%	35−40 +95%
World of Tanks	140−150 −70.3%	240−250 +70.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 −63.6%	70−75 +63.6%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −117%	35−40 +117%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −129%	35−40 +129%
Far Cry 5	60−65 −110%	120−130 +110%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 −102%	110−120 +102%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −73.5%	85−90 +73.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−33 −127%	65−70 +127%
Valorant	55−60 −114%	120−130 +114%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Dota 2	60 −28.3%	75−80 +28.3%
Elden Ring	16−18 −138%	35−40 +138%
Grand Theft Auto V	60 −28.3%	75−80 +28.3%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −106%	30−35 +106%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	65−70 −93.8%	120−130 +93.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −78.6%	24−27 +78.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60 −28.3%	75−80 +28.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −105%	45−50 +105%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −122%	40−45 +122%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −143%	16−18 +143%
Dota 2	35−40 −108%	75−80 +108%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −107%	55−60 +107%
Fortnite	24−27 −112%	55−60 +112%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −100%	60−65 +100%
Valorant	27−30 −137%	60−65 +137%

This is how GTX 980 Mobile and RX 6650M compete in popular games:

RX 6650M is 20% faster in 1080p
RX 6650M is 77% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 980 Mobile is 76% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the RX 6650M is 195% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 980 Mobile is ahead in 5 tests (8%)
RX 6650M is ahead in 57 tests (90%)
there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	21.60	39.03
Recency	21 September 2015	4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	120 Watt

GTX 980 Mobile has 20% lower power consumption.

RX 6650M, on the other hand, has a 80.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 980 Mobile in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.