Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce GTX 980 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980 Ti with RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980 Ti
2015
6 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
35.82
+31.2%

GTX 980 Ti outperforms Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile by a substantial 31% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking138202
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.34no data
Power efficiency9.8253.47
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM200AD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date2 June 2015 (9 years ago)26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$649 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28162048
Core clock speed1000 MHz1485 MHz
Boost clock speed1075 MHz2025 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate189.4129.6
Floating-point processing power6.06 TFLOPS8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs17664
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)600 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.5 GB/s128.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2Portable Device Dependent
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support+-
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GeForce ShadowPlay+-
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980 Ti 35.82
+31.2%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.30

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 980 Ti 23057
+13.9%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 20239

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 980 Ti 48631
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+36.3%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 980 Ti 16961
+20%
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 14136

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+34.7%
75−80
−34.7%
1440p48
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
4K52
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.43no data
1440p13.52no data
4K12.48no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+38.2%
55−60
−38.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Battlefield 5 110−120
+36.5%
85−90
−36.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 90−95
+38.5%
65−70
−38.5%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+40%
130−140
−40%
Hitman 3 75−80
+38.2%
55−60
−38.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+38.2%
110−120
−38.2%
Metro Exodus 110−120
+37.6%
85−90
−37.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+32.3%
65−70
−32.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+35.8%
95−100
−35.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+36.7%
90−95
−36.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75−80
+38.2%
55−60
−38.2%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Battlefield 5 47
+34.3%
35−40
−34.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 36
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 180−190
+40%
130−140
−40%
Hitman 3 75−80
+38.2%
55−60
−38.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+38.2%
110−120
−38.2%
Metro Exodus 49
+40%
35−40
−40%
Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+32.3%
65−70
−32.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+35.8%
95−100
−35.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 155
+40.9%
110−120
−40.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+36.7%
90−95
−36.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 46
+31.4%
35−40
−31.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+37.8%
45−50
−37.8%
Far Cry 5 75−80
+31.7%
60−65
−31.7%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+44%
50−55
−44%
Hitman 3 75−80
+38.2%
55−60
−38.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 150−160
+38.2%
110−120
−38.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 120−130
+35.8%
95−100
−35.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 120−130
+36.7%
90−95
−36.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+32.3%
65−70
−32.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+36%
50−55
−36%
Far Cry New Dawn 55−60
+37.5%
40−45
−37.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+44.4%
27−30
−44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+40%
30−33
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+36.7%
30−33
−36.7%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+36%
150−160
−36%
Hitman 3 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+40%
55−60
−40%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+34%
50−55
−34%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85−90
+41.7%
60−65
−41.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 180−190
+40%
130−140
−40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+35.6%
45−50
−35.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 29
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Hitman 3 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 170−180
+31.5%
130−140
−31.5%
Metro Exodus 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+50%
12−14
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Forza Horizon 4 42
+40%
30−33
−40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 45−50
+37.1%
35−40
−37.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

This is how GTX 980 Ti and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980 Ti is 35% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 37% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980 Ti is 49% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 35.82 27.30
Recency 2 June 2015 26 February 2024
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 980 Ti has a 31.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 614.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980 Ti is a desktop card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 1564 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 18 votes

Rate RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.