GeForce 9200M vs GTX 970M SLI

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking225not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency10.42no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameno dataC79
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date7 October 2014 (10 years ago)15 October 2008 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores256016
Core clock speed924 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors2x 5200 Million314 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)162 Watt12 Watt
Texture fill rateno data3.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0384 TFLOPS
ROPsno data4
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2x 6 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2x 192 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed5000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 October 2014 15 October 2008
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 162 Watt 12 Watt

GTX 970M SLI has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce 9200M, on the other hand, has 1250% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 970M SLI and GeForce 9200M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 970M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce 9200M is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M SLI
GeForce GTX 970M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M
GeForce 9200M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 45 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 970M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.