Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) vs GeForce GTX 850M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 850M and Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 850M
2014
2 GB DDR3, 45 Watt
6.52
+44.6%

GTX 850M outperforms RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking572660
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
Power efficiency9.9320.61
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Vega (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Vega Raven Ridge
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date12 March 2014 (10 years ago)26 October 2017 (7 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640512
Core clock speedUp to 936 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million9,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate36.0857.60
Floating-point processing power1.155 TFLOPS1.843 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs4032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Standard memory configurationDDR3 or GDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speedUp to 2500 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.1
Vulkan1.1.1261.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 850M 6.52
+44.6%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 4.51

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 850M 2513
+44.7%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 1737

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 850M 4386
+23.3%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 3557

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 850M 15863
+54.1%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 10294

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 850M 3086
+29.6%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 2381

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 850M 21873
+38.7%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 15770

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 850M 42
+53.1%
RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) 27

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p84
+52.7%
55−60
−52.7%
Full HD31
+72.2%
18
−72.2%
4K10
+25%
8
−25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9
−11.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+13.3%
15
−13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
−25%
10
+25%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+11.1%
9
−11.1%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−28.6%
18
+28.6%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+0%
18
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−34.9%
58
+34.9%
Hitman 3 12−14
+44.4%
9
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Metro Exodus 18−20
−22.2%
22
+22.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+12.5%
16
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+15.8%
19
−15.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−25%
65
+25%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−76.5%
30
+76.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+63.6%
10−12
−63.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+40%
10
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+66.7%
6
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+40%
10
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+38.5%
13
−38.5%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
−20.9%
52
+20.9%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+30%
30−33
−30%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+5.9%
17
−5.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+80%
10
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+37.5%
16
−37.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+87.1%
31
−87.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−5.8%
55
+5.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+113%
8
−113%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+100%
7
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+100%
5
−100%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+100%
7
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+87%
23
−87%
Hitman 3 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+160%
15
−160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+57.1%
14
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 11
+37.5%
8
−37.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+80%
10
−80%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+42.9%
7−8
−42.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Hitman 3 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
+40%
10−11
−40%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+46.4%
27−30
−46.4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Hitman 3 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20
+500%
3−4
−500%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
+0%
4
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
−28.6%
9
+28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+40%
5−6
−40%

This is how GTX 850M and RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) compete in popular games:

  • GTX 850M is 53% faster in 900p
  • GTX 850M is 72% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 850M is 25% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 850M is 500% faster.
  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is 76% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 850M is ahead in 55 tests (82%)
  • RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) is ahead in 9 tests (13%)
  • there's a draw in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.52 4.51
Recency 12 March 2014 26 October 2017
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 850M has a 44.6% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 850M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GeForce GTX 850M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)
Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 545 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 850M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 1454 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.