Radeon 620 vs GeForce GTX 780M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780M and Radeon 620, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 780M
2013
4 GB GDDR5, 122 Watt
9.94
+328%

GTX 780M outperforms 620 by a whopping 328% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking449845
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.643.21
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK104Polaris 24
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date11 May 2013 (11 years ago)13 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536384
Core clock speed823 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speed797 MHz1024 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million1,550 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate102.024.58
Floating-point processing power2.448 TFLOPS0.7864 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs12824

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s14.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (12_0)
Shader Model5.16.3
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.12.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780M 9.94
+328%
Radeon 620 2.32

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780M 3835
+329%
Radeon 620 894

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 780M 5244
+203%
Radeon 620 1730

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD63
+350%
14−16
−350%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+500%
10−12
−500%
Hitman 3 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+189%
18−20
−189%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+200%
10−12
−200%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+70.3%
35−40
−70.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+933%
3−4
−933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+367%
6−7
−367%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+500%
10−12
−500%
Hitman 3 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+189%
18−20
−189%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+200%
10−12
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+70.3%
35−40
−70.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+475%
4−5
−475%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+500%
10−12
−500%
Hitman 3 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+189%
18−20
−189%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+200%
10−12
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+70.3%
35−40
−70.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+460%
5−6
−460%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Far Cry New Dawn 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+900%
1−2
−900%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+267%
3−4
−267%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+340%
10−11
−340%
Hitman 3 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+250%
6−7
−250%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Watch Dogs: Legion 60−65
+385%
12−14
−385%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 9−10 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Hitman 3 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
+330%
10−11
−330%
Metro Exodus 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+500%
2−3
−500%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%

This is how GTX 780M and Radeon 620 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780M is 350% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 780M is 3100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 780M surpassed Radeon 620 in all 56 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.94 2.32
Recency 11 May 2013 13 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 50 Watt

GTX 780M has a 328.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Radeon 620, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and 144% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780M is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 620 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M
GeForce GTX 780M
AMD Radeon 620
Radeon 620

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 108 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 65 votes

Rate Radeon 620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.