Quadro M2000 vs GeForce GTX 780 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 780 Ti with Quadro M2000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 780 Ti
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
24.73
+139%

GTX 780 Ti outperforms M2000 by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking221442
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.343.63
Power efficiency6.789.45
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK110BGM206
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date7 November 2013 (11 years ago)8 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 $437.75

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 780 Ti has 75% better value for money than Quadro M2000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2880768
Core clock speed875 MHz796 MHz
Boost clock speed928 MHz1163 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million2,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate222.755.82
Floating-point processing power5.345 TFLOPS1.786 TFLOPS
ROPs4832
TMUs24048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm201 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot1" (2.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5128 Bit
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7.0 GB/s1653 MHz
Memory bandwidth336 GB/sUp to 106 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort4x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
Number of simultaneous displaysno data4
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
3D Vision Live+-
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Desktop Managementno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.44.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.1.126
CUDA+5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 780 Ti 24.73
+139%
Quadro M2000 10.34

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 780 Ti 9528
+139%
Quadro M2000 3985

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 780 Ti 28293
+94.3%
Quadro M2000 14564

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 780 Ti 26297
+84.1%
Quadro M2000 14286

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

GTX 780 Ti 20877
+59.4%
Quadro M2000 13100

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

GTX 780 Ti 103
+203%
Quadro M2000 34

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+148%
40−45
−148%

Cost per frame, $

1080p7.0610.94

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+171%
21−24
−171%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+140%
60−65
−140%
Hitman 3 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+153%
45−50
−153%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+177%
30−33
−177%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+155%
40−45
−155%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Battlefield 5 80−85
+170%
30−33
−170%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+171%
21−24
−171%
Far Cry New Dawn 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+140%
60−65
−140%
Hitman 3 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+153%
45−50
−153%
Metro Exodus 85−90
+143%
35−40
−143%
Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+177%
30−33
−177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+155%
40−45
−155%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+150%
16−18
−150%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+171%
21−24
−171%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+140%
60−65
−140%
Hitman 3 50−55
+178%
18−20
−178%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+153%
45−50
−153%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80−85
+177%
30−33
−177%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50−55
+152%
21−24
−152%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+155%
40−45
−155%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 60−65
+167%
24−27
−167%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
+171%
14−16
−171%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+156%
55−60
−156%
Hitman 3 27−30
+142%
12−14
−142%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
+143%
21−24
−143%
Metro Exodus 45−50
+161%
18−20
−161%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+157%
21−24
−157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+155%
55−60
−155%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40−45
+156%
16−18
−156%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Hitman 3 18−20
+171%
7−8
−171%
Horizon Zero Dawn 120−130
+154%
50−55
−154%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+180%
10−11
−180%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+170%
10−11
−170%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+150%
6−7
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+180%
5−6
−180%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+143%
14−16
−143%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%

This is how GTX 780 Ti and Quadro M2000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 780 Ti is 148% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.73 10.34
Recency 7 November 2013 8 April 2016
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 75 Watt

GTX 780 Ti has a 139.2% higher aggregate performance score.

Quadro M2000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 780 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 780 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 654 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 780 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 210 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.