Radeon RX Vega 10 vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 765M SLI and Radeon RX Vega 10, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 765M SLI
2013
2x 2 GB GDDR5, 130 Watt
10.44
+152%

GTX 765M SLI outperforms RX Vega 10 by a whopping 152% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking438691
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.6429.14
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameno dataRaven
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date30 May 2013 (11 years ago)8 January 2019 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536640
Core clock speed850 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1301 MHz
Number of transistors2x 2540 Million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt10 Watt
Texture fill rateno data52.04
Floating-point processing powerno data1.665 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2x 2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width2x 128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed4000 MHzSystem Shared
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2.131
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 765M SLI 10.44
+152%
RX Vega 10 4.15

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 765M SLI 7944
+134%
RX Vega 10 3389

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 765M SLI 25021
+120%
RX Vega 10 11391

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 765M SLI 5073
+123%
RX Vega 10 2272

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 765M SLI 35376
+138%
RX Vega 10 14835

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

GTX 765M SLI 68
+172%
RX Vega 10 25

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD71
+294%
18
−294%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+31.6%
19
−31.6%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+100%
9
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+75%
12
−75%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+66.7%
15
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+132%
19
−132%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+133%
9
−133%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+175%
12
−175%
Fortnite 60−65
+81.8%
33
−81.8%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+153%
17
−153%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+85.7%
14
−85.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+140%
15
−140%
Valorant 90−95
+74.1%
50−55
−74.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+178%
9
−178%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+175%
16
−175%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+157%
7
−157%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 197
+369%
42
−369%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+320%
5
−320%
Dota 2 70−75
+122%
32
−122%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+200%
11
−200%
Fortnite 60−65
+300%
15
−300%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+207%
14
−207%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+280%
10
−280%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+233%
6
−233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+200%
12
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+117%
12
−117%
Valorant 90−95
+74.1%
50−55
−74.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+159%
17
−159%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+80%
10−11
−80%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Dota 2 70−75
+145%
29
−145%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+230%
10
−230%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+126%
18−20
−126%
Forza Horizon 5 24−27
+225%
8−9
−225%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+125%
16−18
−125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+225%
8
−225%
Valorant 90−95
+74.1%
50−55
−74.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+161%
21−24
−161%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 75−80
+153%
30−33
−153%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+250%
4−5
−250%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+450%
2−3
−450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 50−55
+72.4%
27−30
−72.4%
Valorant 110−120
+158%
40−45
−158%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+200%
7−8
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+167%
9−10
−167%
Forza Horizon 5 18−20
+260%
5−6
−260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+167%
6−7
−167%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+31.3%
16−18
−31.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+200%
2−3
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Valorant 50−55
+165%
20−22
−165%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+200%
4−5
−200%
Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Dota 2 35−40
+185%
12−14
−185%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+240%
5−6
−240%
Forza Horizon 5 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

This is how GTX 765M SLI and RX Vega 10 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 765M SLI is 294% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 765M SLI is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 765M SLI is ahead in 61 test (98%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (2%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.44 4.15
Recency 30 May 2013 8 January 2019
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 10 Watt

GTX 765M SLI has a 151.6% higher aggregate performance score.

RX Vega 10, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 1200% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 765M SLI is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX Vega 10 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M SLI
GeForce GTX 765M SLI
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10
Radeon RX Vega 10

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 25 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 765M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 1080 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 10 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 765M SLI or Radeon RX Vega 10, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.