Radeon RX 6600S vs GeForce GTX 765M SLI

Place in the ranking	428	142
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.75	30.80
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code name	no data	Navi 23
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	1792
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1700 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2000 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 2540 Million	11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	224.0
Floating-point processing power	no data	7.168 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	64
TMUs	no data	112
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2x 2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2x 128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	2.1
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−219%

220−230
+219%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−281%

60−65
+281%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −204%	75−80 +204%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −281%	60−65 +281%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −248%	110−120 +248%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −243%	70−75 +243%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −281%	60−65 +281%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −212%	75−80 +212%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −197%	85−90 +197%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −155%	180−190 +155%
Hitman 3	20−22 −275%	75−80 +275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −160%	150−160 +160%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −241%	110−120 +241%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −183%	85−90 +183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −263%	120−130 +263%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −89.2%	120−130 +89.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −204%	75−80 +204%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −281%	60−65 +281%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −248%	110−120 +248%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −243%	70−75 +243%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −281%	60−65 +281%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −212%	75−80 +212%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 −197%	85−90 +197%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −155%	180−190 +155%
Hitman 3	20−22 −275%	75−80 +275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −160%	150−160 +160%
Metro Exodus	30−35 −241%	110−120 +241%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −183%	85−90 +183%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −263%	120−130 +263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −164%	70−75 +164%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −89.2%	120−130 +89.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −204%	75−80 +204%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −281%	60−65 +281%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −243%	70−75 +243%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −281%	60−65 +281%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −212%	75−80 +212%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −155%	180−190 +155%
Hitman 3	20−22 −275%	75−80 +275%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −160%	150−160 +160%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 −263%	120−130 +263%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −164%	70−75 +164%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −89.2%	120−130 +89.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−33

−183%

85−90
+183%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −224%	65−70 +224%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −238%	50−55 +238%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −280%	35−40 +280%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −443%	35−40 +443%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −273%	40−45 +273%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −440%	27−30 +440%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −242%	40−45 +242%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −312%	200−210 +312%
Hitman 3	14−16 −221%	45−50 +221%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −245%	75−80 +245%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −319%	65−70 +319%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −460%	80−85 +460%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −390%	45−50 +390%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −169%	180−190 +169%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20

−239%

60−65
+239%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −250%	35−40 +250%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −263%	27−30 +263%
Hitman 3	7−8 −314%	27−30 +314%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −262%	170−180 +262%
Metro Exodus	9−10 −389%	40−45 +389%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −413%	40−45 +413%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −283%	21−24 +283%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −320%	21−24 +320%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −340%	21−24 +340%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −277%	45−50 +277%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −488%	45−50 +488%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −325%	16−18 +325%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−210%

30−35
+210%

This is how GTX 765M SLI and RX 6600S compete in popular games:

RX 6600S is 219% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 6600S is 1000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 6600S surpassed GTX 765M SLI in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.76	35.45
Recency	30 May 2013	4 January 2022
Chip lithography	28 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	130 Watt	80 Watt

RX 6600S has a 229.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 62.5% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6600S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 765M SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.