Quadro FX 5500 vs GeForce GTX 760A

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760A with Quadro FX 5500, including specs and performance data.

GTX 760A
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
3.18
+405%

GTX 760A outperforms FX 5500 by a whopping 405% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7491196
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.960.45
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGK106G71
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)20 April 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768no data
Core clock speed628 MHz650 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 million278 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt96 Watt
Texture fill rate42.0515.60
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1616
TMUs6424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1002 MHz505 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s32.32 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model5.13.0
OpenGL4.62.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760A 3.18
+405%
FX 5500 0.63

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 760A 1226
+407%
FX 5500 242

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.18 0.63
Recency 17 March 2014 20 April 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 96 Watt

GTX 760A has a 404.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 74.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 760A is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 5500 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760A is a notebook card while Quadro FX 5500 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 760A
NVIDIA Quadro FX 5500
Quadro FX 5500

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 26 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.