ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2 vs GeForce GTX 760A

GTX 760A GTX 760M GTX 765M GTX 765M SLI
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 4850 Mobility Radeon HD 4850 Mac Edition Mobility Radeon HD 4850 X2 Mobility Radeon HD 4870 Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760A and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 760A
2014
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
3.19
+2.2%

GTX 760A outperforms ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 760A GTX 760A
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 Mobility HD 4870 X2

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking759769
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency3.97no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGK106M98
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 March 2014 (10 years ago)9 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768800 ×2
Core clock speed628 MHz550 MHz
Boost clock speed657 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,540 million956 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate42.0522.00 ×2
Floating-point processing power1.009 TFLOPS0.88 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1616 ×2
TMUs6440 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB ×2
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1002 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth64.13 GB/s89.6 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
−10%
44
+10%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

This is how GTX 760A and ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 is 10% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.19 3.12
Recency 17 March 2014 9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 55 nm

GTX 760A has a 2.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 760A and Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760A
GeForce GTX 760A
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 760A GeForce GTX 760A
vs
GTX 460M GeForce GTX 460M
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
vs
GeForce 830A GeForce 830A
GTX 760A GeForce GTX 760A
vs
R9 M270X Radeon R9 M270X
R7 M360 Radeon R7 M360
vs
GT 720A GT 720A
R5 M315 Radeon R5 M315
vs
GeForce 800A GeForce 800A
R5 M320 Radeon R5 M320
vs
GeForce 800M GeForce 800M
GeForce 820A GeForce 820A
vs
HD 6570M HD 6570M
ATI Mobility HD 5870 Mobility Radeon HD 5870
vs
GeForce 840A GeForce 840A
GT 820M GeForce GT 820M
vs
HD 6570M HD 6570M
RX 550 Mobile Radeon RX 550 Mobile
vs
GTX 780M Mac Edition GTX 780M Mac Edition
ATI Mobility HD 4870 X2 Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
vs
GT 745A GT 745A
HD 7450M Radeon HD 7450M
vs
GeForce 720M GeForce 720M
R9 M385X Radeon R9 M385X
vs
GTX 675MX Mac Edition GTX 675MX Mac Edition

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 26 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 760A or Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.