Radeon RX 7800 XT vs GeForce GTX 760

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760 and Radeon RX 7800 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 760
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
12.42

RX 7800 XT outperforms GTX 760 by a whopping 408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking39730
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.3667.88
Power efficiency5.0516.58
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK104Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date25 June 2013 (11 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 7800 XT has 1457% better value for money than GTX 760.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11523840
Core clock speed980 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz2430 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Watt263 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate99.07583.2
Floating-point processing power2.378 TFLOPS37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs96240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slot2-slot
Minimum recommended system power500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI++
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
PhysX+-
3D Vision Live+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.34.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760 12.42
RX 7800 XT 63.07
+408%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 760 4792
RX 7800 XT 24332
+408%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 760 7962
RX 7800 XT 65611
+724%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 760 29073
RX 7800 XT 134322
+362%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 760 5959
RX 7800 XT 49707
+734%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 760 40150
RX 7800 XT 202773
+405%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD69
−216%
218
+216%
1440p24−27
−408%
122
+408%
4K14−16
−421%
73
+421%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.612.29
1440p10.384.09
4K17.796.84

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−1258%
258
+1258%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−514%
178
+514%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−1068%
222
+1068%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−398%
190−200
+398%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−356%
110−120
+356%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−916%
193
+916%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−290%
110−120
+290%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−344%
150−160
+344%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−180%
230−240
+180%
Hitman 3 21−24
−439%
120−130
+439%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−258%
230−240
+258%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−278%
150−160
+278%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−247%
110−120
+247%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−540%
250−260
+540%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−111%
150−160
+111%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−800%
261
+800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−853%
181
+853%
Battlefield 5 40−45
−398%
190−200
+398%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−356%
110−120
+356%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−747%
161
+747%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−290%
110−120
+290%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−344%
150−160
+344%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−180%
230−240
+180%
Hitman 3 21−24
−439%
120−130
+439%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−258%
230−240
+258%
Metro Exodus 40−45
−278%
150−160
+278%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−247%
110−120
+247%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−895%
398
+895%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−326%
130−140
+326%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−111%
150−160
+111%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−348%
130
+348%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
−732%
158
+732%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−356%
110−120
+356%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−679%
148
+679%
Far Cry 5 27−30
−290%
110−120
+290%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−171%
222
+171%
Hitman 3 21−24
−439%
120−130
+439%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−322%
274
+322%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
−750%
340
+750%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−545%
200
+545%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
−104%
145
+104%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−247%
110−120
+247%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−483%
140−150
+483%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
−416%
95−100
+416%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
−892%
119
+892%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
−1278%
124
+1278%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
−469%
70−75
+469%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1517%
97
+1517%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−421%
70−75
+421%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
−344%
270−280
+344%
Hitman 3 14−16
−500%
90−95
+500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−768%
217
+768%
Metro Exodus 20−22
−640%
148
+640%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
−1115%
243
+1115%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1125%
147
+1125%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
−201%
230−240
+201%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−425%
100−110
+425%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
−508%
70−75
+508%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−578%
60−65
+578%
Hitman 3 8−9
−575%
50−55
+575%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−278%
220−230
+278%
Metro Exodus 10−12
−755%
90−95
+755%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−973%
118
+973%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−1171%
89
+1171%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
−1100%
72
+1100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−650%
45−50
+650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−2100%
44
+2100%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−514%
40−45
+514%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−925%
164
+925%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
−1082%
130
+1082%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
−1240%
67
+1240%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−482%
60−65
+482%

This is how GTX 760 and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 216% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7800 XT is 408% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7800 XT is 421% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7800 XT is 2100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7800 XT surpassed GTX 760 in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.42 63.07
Recency 25 June 2013 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 170 Watt 263 Watt

GTX 760 has 54.7% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 407.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 760 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2076 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2722 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.