Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs GTX 760

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 760 with GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 760
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 170 Watt
12.45

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile outperforms GTX 760 by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking400395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.51no data
Power efficiency5.02no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK104no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 June 2013 (11 years ago)April 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$249 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1152768
Core clock speed980 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speed1033 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)170 Wattno data
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate99.07no data
Floating-point processing power2.378 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length241 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Minimum recommended system power500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s84 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPortno data
Multi monitor support4 displaysno data
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
G-SYNC support-+
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3D+-
3D Gaming+-
3D Vision+-
PhysX+-
3D Vision Live+-
Multi-Projectionno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)no data
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.3no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 760 12.45
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.63
+1.4%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 760 5959
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401
+7.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD68
+4.6%
65−70
−4.6%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.66no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+2.5%
40−45
−2.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+2.5%
80−85
−2.5%
Hitman 3 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+1.4%
70−75
−1.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+1.7%
60−65
−1.7%
Hitman 3 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+4.2%
24−27
−4.2%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 75−80
+4%
75−80
−4%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hitman 3 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
+7.3%
55−60
−7.3%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%

This is how GTX 760 and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • GTX 760 is 5% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.45 12.63
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

GTX 760 has a 68166.7% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 1.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 760 and GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 760 is a desktop card while GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760
GeForce GTX 760
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 2113 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 114 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.