GeForce RTX 4090 vs GTX 675M SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 675M SLI with GeForce RTX 4090, including specs and performance data.

GTX 675M SLI
2011
2 Watt
8.68

RTX 4090 outperforms GTX 675M SLI by a whopping 1052% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4981
Place by popularitynot in top-1006
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data18.56
Power efficiency2.9915.30
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameN12E-GTX2AD102
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date6 January 2011 (14 years ago)20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores76816384
Core clock speed620 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistorsno data76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)2x 100 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1,290
Floating-point processing powerno data82.58 TFLOPS
ROPsno data176
TMUsno data512
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amountno data24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed3000 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1112 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 675M SLI 8.68
RTX 4090 100.00
+1052%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 675M SLI 6407
RTX 4090 104598
+1533%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 675M SLI 18405
RTX 4090 137609
+648%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD21−24
−1129%
258
+1129%
1440p16−18
−1131%
197
+1131%
4K12−14
−1092%
143
+1092%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data6.20
1440pno data8.12
4Kno data11.18

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−1147%
212
+1147%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−1224%
225
+1224%
Elden Ring 24−27
−938%
249
+938%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−318%
110−120
+318%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−1165%
215
+1165%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−553%
111
+553%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−1486%
555
+1486%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−674%
178
+674%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−550%
150−160
+550%
Valorant 30−35
−2565%
826
+2565%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−318%
110−120
+318%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−1071%
199
+1071%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−529%
107
+529%
Dota 2 30−35
−545%
200
+545%
Elden Ring 24−27
−1850%
468
+1850%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−303%
149
+303%
Fortnite 50−55
−504%
300−350
+504%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−1466%
548
+1466%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
−461%
174
+461%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−696%
183
+696%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−216%
210−220
+216%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−550%
150−160
+550%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
−569%
170−180
+569%
Valorant 30−35
−2400%
750−800
+2400%
World of Tanks 120−130
−116%
270−280
+116%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−318%
110−120
+318%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−988%
185
+988%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−518%
105
+518%
Dota 2 30−35
−623%
224
+623%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−478%
210−220
+478%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−1454%
544
+1454%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
−216%
210−220
+216%
Valorant 30−35
−2094%
680
+2094%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−11
−1520%
162
+1520%
Elden Ring 12−14
−2758%
343
+2758%
Grand Theft Auto V 10−12
−1364%
161
+1364%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−317%
170−180
+317%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−1229%
90−95
+1229%
World of Tanks 60−65
−719%
500−550
+719%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−444%
85−90
+444%
Counter-Strike 2 10−11
−1420%
152
+1420%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−1183%
77
+1183%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−789%
160−170
+789%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−2717%
507
+2717%
Metro Exodus 14−16
−913%
152
+913%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−2520%
262
+2520%
Valorant 21−24
−2500%
572
+2500%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−5433%
166
+5433%
Dota 2 18−20
−884%
187
+884%
Elden Ring 5−6
−3860%
198
+3860%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−884%
187
+884%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−3325%
137
+3325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−736%
200−210
+736%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−967%
60−65
+967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−884%
187
+884%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8
−1200%
90−95
+1200%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−4900%
150−160
+4900%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−1900%
40
+1900%
Dota 2 18−20
−1095%
227
+1095%
Far Cry 5 10−11
−950%
100−110
+950%
Fortnite 9−10
−967%
95−100
+967%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−2740%
284
+2740%
Valorant 8−9
−4450%
364
+4450%

This is how GTX 675M SLI and RTX 4090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 is 1129% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 is 1131% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 is 1092% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 4090 is 5433% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 4090 surpassed GTX 675M SLI in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.68 100.00
Recency 6 January 2011 20 September 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 2 Watt 450 Watt

GTX 675M SLI has 22400% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090, on the other hand, has a 1052.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 675M SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 675M SLI is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4090 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675M SLI
GeForce GTX 675M SLI
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
GeForce RTX 4090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 4 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 675M SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15744 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.