GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile vs GTX 260M SLI

Place in the ranking	749	29
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.51	40.93
Architecture	G9x (2007−2010)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	NB9E-GTX	AD104
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 March 2009 (15 years ago)	3 January 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	224	7424
Core clock speed	550 MHz	1290 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1665 MHz
Number of transistors	1508 Million	35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	110 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	386.3
Floating-point processing power	no data	24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	80
TMUs	no data	232
Tensor Cores	no data	232
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	58

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	950 MHz	2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	432.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 260M SLI 3.25

RTX 4080 Mobile 64.56
+1886%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 260M SLI 8959

RTX 4080 Mobile 111294
+1142%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	7−8 −2114%	155 +2114%
1440p	5−6 −1960%	103 +1960%
4K	3−4 −2167%	68 +2167%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −2022%	191 +2022%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −1763%	149 +1763%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −1200%	110−120 +1200%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1400%	135 +1400%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −788%	71 +788%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −2453%	383 +2453%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −4200%	172 +4200%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −2150%	130−140 +2150%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −982%	110−120 +982%
Valorant	5−6 −6160%	300−350 +6160%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −1200%	110−120 +1200%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1311%	127 +1311%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −675%	62 +675%
Dota 2	9−10 −1722%	164 +1722%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −606%	127 +606%
Fortnite	18−20 −1322%	250−260 +1322%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −2240%	351 +2240%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −4075%	160−170 +4075%
Grand Theft Auto V	9−10 −1644%	157 +1644%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −917%	61 +917%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −617%	210−220 +617%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 −982%	110−120 +982%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −1350%	170−180 +1350%
Valorant	5−6 −6160%	300−350 +6160%
World of Tanks	55−60 −381%	270−280 +381%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	9−10 −1200%	110−120 +1200%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −1156%	113 +1156%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 −663%	61 +663%
Dota 2	9−10 −1733%	165 +1733%
Far Cry 5	18−20 −600%	120−130 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 −2053%	323 +2053%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −4100%	168 +4100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	30−33 −617%	210−220 +617%
Valorant	5−6 −6160%	300−350 +6160%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	2−3 −6000%	122 +6000%
Grand Theft Auto V	2−3 −6000%	122 +6000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −695%	170−180 +695%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −3900%	80−85 +3900%
World of Tanks	21−24 −1843%	400−450 +1843%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −2800%	85−90 +2800%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −925%	41 +925%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −1900%	160−170 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	3−4 −7800%	237 +7800%
Forza Horizon 5	4−5 −2950%	120−130 +2950%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −2233%	140 +2233%
Valorant	10−11 −2620%	270−280 +2620%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −783%	53 +783%
Dota 2	16−18 −800%	144 +800%
Grand Theft Auto V	16−18 −800%	144 +800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	9−10 −2222%	200−210 +2222%
Red Dead Redemption 2	2−3 −2600%	50−55 +2600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −800%	144 +800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −2700%	80−85 +2700%
Counter-Strike 2	6−7 −183%	17 +183%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −900%	20 +900%
Dota 2	16−18 −881%	157 +881%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −3400%	100−110 +3400%
Fortnite	2−3 −4700%	95−100 +4700%
Forza Horizon 4	1−2 −12100%	122 +12100%
Forza Horizon 5	1−2 −7400%	75−80 +7400%
Valorant	3−4 −5067%	150−160 +5067%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Metro Exodus

120−130

+0%

120−130

+0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus

+0%

This is how GTX 260M SLI and RTX 4080 Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 Mobile is 2114% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 Mobile is 1960% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 Mobile is 2167% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 Mobile is 12100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 4080 Mobile is ahead in 61 test (97%)
there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.25	64.56
Recency	2 March 2009	3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	12 GB
Chip lithography	55 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	110 Watt

RTX 4080 Mobile has a 1886.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1275% more advanced lithography process, and 36.4% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 260M SLI in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.