Radeon 760M vs ATI FirePro M7740

Place in the ranking	874	353
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.80	22.71
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	M97	Phoenix
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	4 August 2009 (15 years ago)	6 December 2023 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	512
Core clock speed	650 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2599 MHz
Number of transistors	826 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	83.17
Floating-point processing power	0.832 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	846 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	54.14 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.7
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI M7740 2.10

Radeon 760M 14.97
+613%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI M7740 6626

Radeon 760M 32985
+398%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	4−5 −675%	31 +675%
1440p	2−3 −800%	18 +800%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−500%

30
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −520%	30−35 +520%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −380%	24 +380%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1100%	35−40 +1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −740%	40−45 +740%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1000%	95−100 +1000%
Hitman 3	7−8 −314%	27−30 +314%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −328%	75−80 +328%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −950%	40−45 +950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −400%	50−55 +400%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −119%	75−80 +119%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Battlefield 5	2−3 −2400%	50−55 +2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −520%	30−35 +520%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −260%	18 +260%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1100%	35−40 +1100%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −740%	40−45 +740%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1000%	95−100 +1000%
Hitman 3	7−8 −314%	27−30 +314%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −328%	75−80 +328%
Red Dead Redemption 2	4−5 −950%	40−45 +950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −340%	44 +340%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −200%	35−40 +200%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −119%	75−80 +119%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	7−8 −400%	35−40 +400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −520%	30−35 +520%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −380%	24−27 +380%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −1100%	35−40 +1100%
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 −1000%	95−100 +1000%
Hitman 3	7−8 −314%	27−30 +314%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −328%	75−80 +328%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −270%	37 +270%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −91.7%	23 +91.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −119%	75−80 +119%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−950%

40−45
+950%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −867%	27−30 +867%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −667%	21−24 +667%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −650%	14−16 +650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −800%	18−20 +800%
Hitman 3	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Horizon Zero Dawn	6−7 −417%	30−35 +417%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −675%	90−95 +675%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6

−400%

24−27
+400%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	0−1	14−16
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −600%	7−8 +600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	6−7

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−367%

14−16
+367%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla

24−27

+0%

24−27

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Metro Exodus	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	75−80 +0%	75−80 +0%
Metro Exodus	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%

This is how ATI M7740 and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

Radeon 760M is 675% faster in 1080p
Radeon 760M is 800% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 760M is 2400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 760M is ahead in 54 tests (77%)
there's a draw in 16 tests (23%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.10	14.97
Recency	4 August 2009	6 December 2023
Chip lithography	40 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 612.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M7740 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M7740 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 760M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.