Radeon 760M vs ATI FirePro M7740

Place in the ranking	871	359
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	2.48	68.13
Architecture	TeraScale (2005−2013)	RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code name	M97	Hawx Point
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	4 August 2009 (15 years ago)	6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	512
Core clock speed	650 MHz	800 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2599 MHz
Number of transistors	826 million	25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	20.80	83.17
Floating-point processing power	0.832 TFLOPS	5.323 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	846 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	54.14 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	10.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.8
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.1
Vulkan	N/A	1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

ATI M7740 2.06

Radeon 760M 14.17
+588%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

ATI M7740 6626

Radeon 760M 32985
+398%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	4−5 −675%	31 +675%
1440p	2−3 −850%	19 +850%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −213%	25 +213%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −400%	30 +400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −1100%	45−50 +1100%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −225%	26 +225%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −100%	12 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −364%	51 +364%
Forza Horizon 5	0−1	35−40
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −300%	35−40 +300%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −1100%	45−50 +1100%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −125%	18 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −50%	9 +50%
Dota 2	5−6 −360%	23 +360%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −107%	29 +107%
Fortnite	10−12 −655%	80−85 +655%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −300%	44 +300%
Forza Horizon 5	0−1	35−40
Grand Theft Auto V	5−6 −580%	34 +580%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −1267%	40−45 +1267%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −410%	100−110 +410%
Red Dead Redemption 2	9−10 −300%	35−40 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −400%	45−50 +400%
World of Tanks	40−45 −371%	190−200 +371%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −1100%	45−50 +1100%
Counter-Strike 2	8−9 −125%	18 +125%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −383%	27−30 +383%
Dota 2	5−6 −980%	50−55 +980%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −286%	50−55 +286%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −236%	37 +236%
Forza Horizon 5	0−1	35−40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	21−24 −410%	100−110 +410%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	0−1	21−24
Grand Theft Auto V	0−1	21−24
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	14−16 −686%	110−120 +686%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −1200%	12−14 +1200%
World of Tanks	14−16 −643%	100−110 +643%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −2900%	30−33 +2900%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −500%	35−40 +500%
Forza Horizon 5	2−3 −1050%	21−24 +1050%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −300%	20−22 +300%
Valorant	8−9 −363%	35−40 +363%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Dota 2	16−18 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −73.3%	24−27 +73.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	6−7 −633%	40−45 +633%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −900%	10−11 +900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −73.3%	24−27 +73.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	2−3 −600%	14−16 +600%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Dota 2	16−18 −62.5%	24−27 +62.5%
Far Cry 5	2−3 −850%	18−20 +850%
Fortnite	0−1	16−18
Forza Horizon 5	0−1	10−12
Valorant	2−3 −700%	16−18 +700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant

60−65

+0%

60−65

+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%

4K
High Preset

Metro Exodus

10−11

+0%

10−11

+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

21−24

+0%

21−24

+0%

This is how ATI M7740 and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:

Radeon 760M is 675% faster in 1080p
Radeon 760M is 850% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Radeon 760M is 2900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Radeon 760M is ahead in 47 tests (84%)
there's a draw in 9 tests (16%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.06	14.17
Recency	4 August 2009	6 December 2023
Chip lithography	40 nm	4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	15 Watt

Radeon 760M has a 587.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 300% lower power consumption.

The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M7740 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro M7740 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon 760M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.