Quadro K2200M vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Quadro K2200M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
28.89
+269%

GTX 1660 Ti outperforms K2200M by a whopping 269% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking170494
Place by popularity31not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation39.02no data
Power efficiency19.089.55
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameTU116GM107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date22 February 2019 (6 years ago)19 July 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536640
Core clock speed1500 MHz667 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHzno data
Number of transistors6,600 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate169.926.68
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS0.8538 TFLOPS
ROPs4816
TMUs9640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA7.55.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1660 Ti 28.89
+269%
K2200M 7.83

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12909
+269%
K2200M 3501

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1660 Ti 60963
+465%
K2200M 10787

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
+285%
27−30
−285%
1440p59
+321%
14−16
−321%
4K39
+290%
10−12
−290%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.68no data
1440p4.73no data
4K7.15no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+275%
24−27
−275%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+300%
45−50
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+271%
21−24
−271%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+275%
24−27
−275%
Battlefield 5 129
+330%
30−33
−330%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+300%
45−50
−300%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
+294%
18−20
−294%
Far Cry 5 109
+304%
27−30
−304%
Fortnite 247
+280%
65−70
−280%
Forza Horizon 4 131
+274%
35−40
−274%
Forza Horizon 5 107
+296%
27−30
−296%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200
+300%
50−55
−300%
Valorant 190−200
+290%
50−55
−290%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 90−95
+275%
24−27
−275%
Battlefield 5 112
+273%
30−33
−273%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+300%
45−50
−300%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+293%
70−75
−293%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
+307%
14−16
−307%
Dota 2 181
+302%
45−50
−302%
Far Cry 5 99
+313%
24−27
−313%
Fortnite 143
+309%
35−40
−309%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+307%
30−33
−307%
Forza Horizon 5 94
+292%
24−27
−292%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
+297%
30−33
−297%
Metro Exodus 55
+293%
14−16
−293%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150
+275%
40−45
−275%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
+287%
30−33
−287%
Valorant 190−200
+290%
50−55
−290%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
+278%
27−30
−278%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
+283%
12−14
−283%
Dota 2 168
+273%
45−50
−273%
Far Cry 5 94
+292%
24−27
−292%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+304%
24−27
−304%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 129
+330%
30−33
−330%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+288%
16−18
−288%
Valorant 118
+293%
30−33
−293%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 117
+290%
30−33
−290%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+317%
18−20
−317%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+293%
55−60
−293%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+288%
16−18
−288%
Metro Exodus 33
+313%
8−9
−313%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+289%
45−50
−289%
Valorant 230−240
+287%
60−65
−287%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
+322%
18−20
−322%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+286%
7−8
−286%
Far Cry 5 67
+272%
18−20
−272%
Forza Horizon 4 77
+328%
18−20
−328%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+300%
14−16
−300%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75
+317%
18−20
−317%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 24−27
+317%
6−7
−317%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+300%
14−16
−300%
Metro Exodus 21
+320%
5−6
−320%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
+330%
10−11
−330%
Valorant 180−190
+276%
50−55
−276%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+330%
10−11
−330%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+289%
9−10
−289%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+450%
2−3
−450%
Dota 2 94
+292%
24−27
−292%
Far Cry 5 35
+289%
9−10
−289%
Forza Horizon 4 51
+325%
12−14
−325%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
+290%
10−11
−290%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
+317%
6−7
−317%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and K2200M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Ti is 285% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 321% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti is 290% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.89 7.83
Recency 22 February 2019 19 July 2014
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 65 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has a 269% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

K2200M, on the other hand, has 84.6% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2200M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop card while Quadro K2200M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA Quadro K2200M
Quadro K2200M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 8357 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 39 votes

Rate Quadro K2200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or Quadro K2200M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.