GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs GTX 1660 Ti

Place in the ranking	162	1037
Place by popularity	24	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	43.19	0.05
Power efficiency	19.26	0.63
Architecture	Turing (2018−2022)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	TU116	G92B
Market segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release date	22 February 2019 (5 years ago)	16 January 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$279	$229

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1660 Ti has 86280% better value for money than 9800 GTX+.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	128
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	738 MHz
Boost clock speed	1770 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	6,600 million	754 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	141 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	no data	105 °C
Texture fill rate	169.9	47.23
Floating-point processing power	5.437 TFLOPS	0.47 TFLOPS
ROPs	48	16
TMUs	96	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	229 mm	267 mm
Height	no data	4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	2x 6-pin
SLI options	-	+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	512 MB
Memory bus width	192 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz	1100 MHz
Memory bandwidth	288.0 GB/s	70.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	HDTVDual Link DVI
Multi monitor support	no data	+
HDMI	+	-
Maximum VGA resolution	no data	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	no data	S/PDIF

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.5	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	7.5	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Ti 33.57
+2502%

9800 GTX+ 1.29

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12907
+2513%

9800 GTX+ 494

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	103 +3333%	3−4 −3333%
1440p	60 +2900%	2−3 −2900%
4K	39 +3800%	1−2 −3800%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	2.71 +2718%	76.33 −2718%
1440p	4.65 +2362%	114.50 −2362%
4K	7.15 +3101%	229.00 −3101%

GTX 1660 Ti has 2718% lower cost per frame in 1080p
GTX 1660 Ti has 2362% lower cost per frame in 1440p
GTX 1660 Ti has 3101% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +3250%	2−3 −3250%
Cyberpunk 2077	78 +3800%	2−3 −3800%
Elden Ring	84 +2700%	3−4 −2700%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	90 +2900%	3−4 −2900%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +3250%	2−3 −3250%
Cyberpunk 2077	36 +3500%	1−2 −3500%
Forza Horizon 4	156 +3020%	5−6 −3020%
Metro Exodus	98 +3167%	3−4 −3167%
Red Dead Redemption 2	119 +2875%	4−5 −2875%
Valorant	161 +2583%	6−7 −2583%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	123 +2975%	4−5 −2975%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +3250%	2−3 −3250%
Cyberpunk 2077	28 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
Dota 2	140 +2700%	5−6 −2700%
Elden Ring	116 +2800%	4−5 −2800%
Far Cry 5	118 +2850%	4−5 −2850%
Fortnite	134 +2580%	5−6 −2580%
Forza Horizon 4	127 +3075%	4−5 −3075%
Grand Theft Auto V	119 +2875%	4−5 −2875%
Metro Exodus	68 +3300%	2−3 −3300%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	180−190 +2571%	7−8 −2571%
Red Dead Redemption 2	45 +4400%	1−2 −4400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	110−120 +2775%	4−5 −2775%
Valorant	82 +2633%	3−4 −2633%
World of Tanks	270−280 +2680%	10−11 −2680%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	78 +3800%	2−3 −3800%
Counter-Strike 2	65−70 +3250%	2−3 −3250%
Cyberpunk 2077	23	0−1
Dota 2	168 +2700%	6−7 −2700%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +2900%	3−4 −2900%
Forza Horizon 4	110 +2650%	4−5 −2650%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	98 +3167%	3−4 −3167%
Valorant	118 +2850%	4−5 −2850%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	62 +3000%	2−3 −3000%
Elden Ring	62 +3000%	2−3 −3000%
Grand Theft Auto V	62 +3000%	2−3 −3000%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +2817%	6−7 −2817%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28 +2700%	1−2 −2700%
World of Tanks	210−220 +2588%	8−9 −2588%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	63 +3050%	2−3 −3050%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Cyberpunk 2077	13	0−1
Far Cry 5	100−110 +2550%	4−5 −2550%
Forza Horizon 4	78 +3800%	2−3 −3800%
Metro Exodus	65 +3150%	2−3 −3150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	55−60 +2650%	2−3 −2650%
Valorant	82 +2633%	3−4 −2633%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Dota 2	56 +2700%	2−3 −2700%
Elden Ring	25	0−1
Grand Theft Auto V	56 +2700%	2−3 −2700%
Metro Exodus	21	0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	100−110 +2550%	4−5 −2550%
Red Dead Redemption 2	19	0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	56 +2700%	2−3 −2700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	31 +3000%	1−2 −3000%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +3200%	1−2 −3200%
Cyberpunk 2077	6	0−1
Dota 2	94 +3033%	3−4 −3033%
Far Cry 5	45−50 +4600%	1−2 −4600%
Fortnite	45−50 +4400%	1−2 −4400%
Forza Horizon 4	43 +4200%	1−2 −4200%
Valorant	41 +4000%	1−2 −4000%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and 9800 GTX+ compete in popular games:

GTX 1660 Ti is 3333% faster in 1080p
GTX 1660 Ti is 2900% faster in 1440p
GTX 1660 Ti is 3800% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	33.57	1.29
Recency	22 February 2019	16 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	512 MB
Chip lithography	12 nm	55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	120 Watt	141 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has a 2502.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 358.3% more advanced lithography process, and 17.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800 GTX+ in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.