GeForce 9200M GS vs GTX 1650 TU106
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 1314 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 1.66 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2022) | Tesla (2006−2010) |
| GPU code name | TU106 | G98 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 18 June 2020 (4 years ago) | 3 June 2008 (16 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 896 | 8 |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 550 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1590 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 million | 210 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 13 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 89.04 | 4.400 |
| Floating-point processing power | 2.849 TFLOPS | 0.0224 TFLOPS |
| Gigaflops | no data | 31 |
| ROPs | 32 | 4 |
| TMUs | 56 | 8 |
| Tensor Cores | 112 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 14 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Length | 229 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 11.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| HDMI | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| CUDA | 7.5 | + |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 18 June 2020 | 3 June 2008 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 65 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 90 Watt | 13 Watt |
GTX 1650 TU106 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 441.7% more advanced lithography process.
9200M GS, on the other hand, has 592.3% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 and GeForce 9200M GS. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 TU106 is a desktop card while GeForce 9200M GS is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
