Radeon Graphics vs GeForce GTX 1080

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon Graphics, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1080
2016
8 GB GDDR5X, 180 Watt
40.25
+1933%

GTX 1080 outperforms Graphics by a whopping 1933% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking101892
Place by popularity4910
Cost-effectiveness evaluation19.47no data
Power efficiency15.499.14
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 5.1 (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGP104Renoir
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 May 2016 (8 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560448
Core clock speed1607 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt15 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate277.342.00
Floating-point processing power8.873 TFLOPS1.344 TFLOPS
ROPs648
TMUs16028

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotIGP
Recommended system power (PSU)500 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed10 GB/sSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth320 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 40.25
+1933%
Radeon Graphics 1.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 15533
+1933%
Radeon Graphics 764

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD126
+2000%
6−7
−2000%
1440p73
+2333%
3−4
−2333%
4K58
+2800%
2−3
−2800%

Cost per frame, $

1080p4.75no data
1440p8.21no data
4K10.33no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+2267%
3−4
−2267%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 92
+2200%
4−5
−2200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Battlefield 5 145
+1971%
7−8
−1971%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 105
+2000%
5−6
−2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+2267%
3−4
−2267%
Far Cry 5 123
+1950%
6−7
−1950%
Far Cry New Dawn 135
+2150%
6−7
−2150%
Forza Horizon 4 320
+2186%
14−16
−2186%
Hitman 3 85−90
+2050%
4−5
−2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+1988%
8−9
−1988%
Metro Exodus 144
+1957%
7−8
−1957%
Red Dead Redemption 2 114
+2180%
5−6
−2180%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 186
+1967%
9−10
−1967%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+2067%
6−7
−2067%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 137
+2183%
6−7
−2183%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Battlefield 5 128
+2033%
6−7
−2033%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95
+2275%
4−5
−2275%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+2267%
3−4
−2267%
Far Cry 5 98
+2350%
4−5
−2350%
Far Cry New Dawn 105
+2000%
5−6
−2000%
Forza Horizon 4 291
+1979%
14−16
−1979%
Hitman 3 85−90
+2050%
4−5
−2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 160−170
+1988%
8−9
−1988%
Metro Exodus 131
+2083%
6−7
−2083%
Red Dead Redemption 2 109
+2080%
5−6
−2080%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+2014%
7−8
−2014%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 152
+2071%
7−8
−2071%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+2067%
6−7
−2067%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 63
+2000%
3−4
−2000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 65−70
+2200%
3−4
−2200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 71
+2267%
3−4
−2267%
Cyberpunk 2077 70−75
+2267%
3−4
−2267%
Far Cry 5 75
+2400%
3−4
−2400%
Forza Horizon 4 112
+2140%
5−6
−2140%
Hitman 3 85−90
+2050%
4−5
−2050%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+2320%
5−6
−2320%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 140−150
+2014%
7−8
−2014%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 81
+2600%
3−4
−2600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130−140
+2067%
6−7
−2067%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 105
+2000%
5−6
−2000%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+2125%
4−5
−2125%
Far Cry New Dawn 74
+2367%
3−4
−2367%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+2350%
2−3
−2350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 45−50
+2150%
2−3
−2150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 51
+2450%
2−3
−2450%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+3100%
1−2
−3100%
Far Cry 5 53
+2550%
2−3
−2550%
Forza Horizon 4 282
+2250%
12−14
−2250%
Hitman 3 50−55
+2500%
2−3
−2500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 92
+2200%
4−5
−2200%
Metro Exodus 82
+1950%
4−5
−1950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+2350%
4−5
−2350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+2850%
2−3
−2850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 190−200
+2067%
9−10
−2067%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 81
+2600%
3−4
−2600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 43
+2050%
2−3
−2050%
Far Cry New Dawn 39
+3800%
1−2
−3800%
Hitman 3 30−35
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 180−190
+1956%
9−10
−1956%
Metro Exodus 47
+2250%
2−3
−2250%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 56
+2700%
2−3
−2700%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 33
+3200%
1−2
−3200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+2400%
1−2
−2400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 29
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16 0−1
Far Cry 5 27
+2600%
1−2
−2600%
Forza Horizon 4 65
+2067%
3−4
−2067%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+2650%
2−3
−2650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+2000%
1−2
−2000%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 42
+2000%
2−3
−2000%

This is how GTX 1080 and Graphics compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 is 2000% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 is 2333% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 is 2800% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 40.25 1.98
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 15 Watt

GTX 1080 has a 1932.8% higher aggregate performance score.

Graphics, on the other hand, has a 128.6% more advanced lithography process, and 1100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon Graphics in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
AMD Radeon Graphics
Radeon Graphics

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 5230 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 6117 votes

Rate Radeon Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.