Radeon Pro Vega 56 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile

Place in the ranking	140	175
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	43.04	45.44
Power efficiency	16.37	10.53
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code name	GP104	Vega 10
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	15 August 2016 (8 years ago)	14 August 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499.99	$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro Vega 56 has 6% better value for money than GTX 1080 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	2560	3584
Core clock speed	1607 MHz	1138 MHz
Boost clock speed	1771 MHz	1250 MHz
Number of transistors	7,200 million	12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	210 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	94 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	283.4	280.0
Floating-point processing power	9.068 TFLOPS	8.96 TFLOPS
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	160	224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Bus support	PCIe 3.0	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	HBM2
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	2048 Bit
Memory clock speed	10 GB/s	786 MHz
Memory bandwidth	320 GB/s	402.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, DL-DVI	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support	+	no data
HDMI	-	+
G-SYNC support	+	-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost	3.0	no data
VR Ready	+	no data
Ansel	+	-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.1.125
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1080 Mobile 35.66
+11%

Pro Vega 56 32.13

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1080 Mobile 28527
+11.5%

Pro Vega 56 25589

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1080 Mobile 21394
+20.2%

Pro Vega 56 17797

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	114 +14%	100 −14%
1440p	70 +16.7%	60−65 −16.7%
4K	56 −8.9%	61 +8.9%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	4.39 −9.9%	3.99 +9.9%
1440p	7.14 −7.4%	6.65 +7.4%
4K	8.93 −36.5%	6.54 +36.5%

Pro Vega 56 has 10% lower cost per frame in 1080p
Pro Vega 56 has 7% lower cost per frame in 1440p
Pro Vega 56 has 36% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +15.9%	60−65 −15.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	75−80 +11.9%	65−70 −11.9%
Elden Ring	120−130 +12.8%	100−110 −12.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	57 −61.4%	90−95 +61.4%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +15.9%	60−65 −15.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	32 −109%	65−70 +109%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +13.4%	140−150 −13.4%
Metro Exodus	89 +9.9%	80−85 −9.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	92 +39.4%	65−70 −39.4%
Valorant	156 +21.9%	120−130 −21.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	103 +12%	90−95 −12%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +15.9%	60−65 −15.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	27 −148%	65−70 +148%
Dota 2	79 +119%	36 −119%
Elden Ring	120−130 +12.8%	100−110 −12.8%
Far Cry 5	67 −31.3%	85−90 +31.3%
Fortnite	160 +6.7%	150−160 −6.7%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +13.4%	140−150 −13.4%
Grand Theft Auto V	119 +13.3%	100−110 −13.3%
Metro Exodus	71 −14.1%	80−85 +14.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	118 −55.1%	180−190 +55.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	51 −29.4%	65−70 +29.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	131 +20.2%	100−110 −20.2%
Valorant	94 −36.2%	120−130 +36.2%
World of Tanks	270−280 +1.1%	270−280 −1.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	53 −73.6%	90−95 +73.6%
Counter-Strike 2	70−75 +15.9%	60−65 −15.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	23 −191%	65−70 +191%
Dota 2	120 +17.6%	102 −17.6%
Far Cry 5	90−95 +5.7%	85−90 −5.7%
Forza Horizon 4	160−170 +13.4%	140−150 −13.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	101 −81.2%	180−190 +81.2%
Valorant	137 +7%	120−130 −7%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	65−70 +14%	55−60 −14%
Elden Ring	70−75 +14.8%	60−65 −14.8%
Grand Theft Auto V	65−70 +14%	55−60 −14%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	32 +3.2%	30−35 −3.2%
World of Tanks	220−230 +9.7%	200−210 −9.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	53 −17%	60−65 +17%
Counter-Strike 2	30−35 +13.3%	30−33 −13.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	14 −114%	30−33 +114%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +12.9%	100−110 −12.9%
Forza Horizon 4	100−110 +13.5%	85−90 −13.5%
Metro Exodus	74 +2.8%	70−75 −2.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	60−65 +17.6%	50−55 −17.6%
Valorant	94 +1.1%	90−95 −1.1%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +16.1%	30−35 −16.1%
Dota 2	76 +28.8%	55−60 −28.8%
Elden Ring	30−35 +17.9%	27−30 −17.9%
Grand Theft Auto V	76 +28.8%	55−60 −28.8%
Metro Exodus	27 +3.8%	24−27 −3.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	110 +8.9%	100−110 −8.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	20 +0%	20−22 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	76 +28.8%	55−60 −28.8%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	42 +16.7%	35−40 −16.7%
Counter-Strike 2	35−40 +16.1%	30−35 −16.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	6 −100%	12−14 +100%
Dota 2	65−70 −41.2%	96 +41.2%
Far Cry 5	50−55 +13.3%	45−50 −13.3%
Fortnite	51 +18.6%	40−45 −18.6%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +13.7%	50−55 −13.7%
Valorant	50 +6.4%	45−50 −6.4%

This is how GTX 1080 Mobile and Pro Vega 56 compete in popular games:

GTX 1080 Mobile is 14% faster in 1080p
GTX 1080 Mobile is 17% faster in 1440p
Pro Vega 56 is 9% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Mobile is 119% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro Vega 56 is 191% faster.

All in all, in popular games: