Quadro P1000 vs GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q with Quadro P1000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 Max-Q
2017
8 GB GDDR5X, 150 Watt
22.84
+128%

GTX 1080 Max-Q outperforms P1000 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking223429
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data5.57
Power efficiency12.1019.93
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP104GP107
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date27 June 2017 (7 years ago)7 February 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$375

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2560640
Core clock speed1290 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed1468 MHz1519 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate234.948.61
Floating-point processing power7.516 TFLOPS1.555 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs16032

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno dataMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5XGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1251 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth320.3 GB/s96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+
VR Ready+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.16.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 22.84
+128%
Quadro P1000 10.03

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
    • 3DMark Time Spy Graphics
    • SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase
    • SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 10207
+128%
Quadro P1000 4481

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 23540
+292%
Quadro P1000 6001

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 39562
+63.2%
Quadro P1000 24240

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 18192
+280%
Quadro P1000 4787

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 114542
+273%
Quadro P1000 30721

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1080 Max-Q 5869
+321%
Quadro P1000 1395

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

GTX 1080 Max-Q 97
+254%
Quadro P1000 27

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 1080 Max-Q 122
+189%
Quadro P1000 42

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD102
+132%
44
−132%
1440p65
+141%
27−30
−141%
4K50
+355%
11
−355%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.52
1440pno data13.89
4Kno data34.09

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 65−70
+156%
27−30
−156%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+142%
55−60
−142%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+145%
21−24
−145%
Atomic Heart 65−70
+156%
27−30
−156%
Battlefield 5 133
+177%
45−50
−177%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+142%
55−60
−142%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+145%
21−24
−145%
Far Cry 5 91
+184%
32
−184%
Fortnite 188
+194%
60−65
−194%
Forza Horizon 4 124
+164%
45−50
−164%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+132%
30−35
−132%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 111
+185%
35−40
−185%
Valorant 160−170
+69%
100−105
−69%
Atomic Heart 65−70
+156%
27−30
−156%
Battlefield 5 121
+152%
45−50
−152%
Counter-Strike 2 140−150
+142%
55−60
−142%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+63.5%
150−160
−63.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+145%
21−24
−145%
Dota 2 106
+39.5%
75−80
−39.5%
Far Cry 5 89
+207%
29
−207%
Fortnite 127
+98.4%
60−65
−98.4%
Forza Horizon 4 122
+160%
45−50
−160%
Forza Horizon 5 75−80
+132%
30−35
−132%
Grand Theft Auto V 94
+129%
40−45
−129%
Metro Exodus 64
+191%
21−24
−191%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 104
+167%
35−40
−167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118
+293%
30
−293%
Valorant 203
+103%
100−105
−103%
Battlefield 5 108
+125%
45−50
−125%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55
+145%
21−24
−145%
Dota 2 102
+34.2%
75−80
−34.2%
Far Cry 5 85
+215%
27
−215%
Forza Horizon 4 106
+126%
45−50
−126%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80
+105%
35−40
−105%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+300%
16
−300%
Valorant 128
+28%
100−105
−28%
Fortnite 109
+70.3%
60−65
−70.3%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+180%
20−22
−180%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 170−180
+111%
80−85
−111%
Grand Theft Auto V 61
+281%
16−18
−281%
Metro Exodus 37
+185%
12−14
−185%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+165%
65−70
−165%
Valorant 194
+63%
110−120
−63%
Battlefield 5 82
+193%
27−30
−193%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+178%
9−10
−178%
Far Cry 5 66
+187%
21−24
−187%
Forza Horizon 4 84
+223%
24−27
−223%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+147%
16−18
−147%
Fortnite 64
+178%
21−24
−178%
Atomic Heart 20−22
+122%
9−10
−122%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Grand Theft Auto V 64
+191%
21−24
−191%
Metro Exodus 23
+229%
7−8
−229%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+246%
12−14
−246%
Valorant 185
+219%
55−60
−219%
Battlefield 5 45
+221%
14−16
−221%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+175%
4−5
−175%
Dota 2 80−85
+103%
40−45
−103%
Far Cry 5 34
+209%
10−12
−209%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+189%
18−20
−189%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 27
+170%
10−11
−170%
Fortnite 34
+240%
10−11
−240%

This is how GTX 1080 Max-Q and Quadro P1000 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 Max-Q is 132% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 Max-Q is 141% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1080 Max-Q is 355% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1080 Max-Q is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1080 Max-Q surpassed Quadro P1000 in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 22.84 10.03
Recency 27 June 2017 7 February 2017
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 40 Watt

GTX 1080 Max-Q has a 127.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro P1000, on the other hand, has a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 275% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q is a notebook card while Quadro P1000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2
37 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5
596 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1080 Max-Q or Quadro P1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.