Quadro M2000M vs GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile with Quadro M2000M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1070 Mobile
2016
8 GB GDDR5, 120 Watt
28.55
+219%

GTX 1070 Mobile outperforms M2000M by a whopping 219% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking196487
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation34.80no data
Power efficiency16.3011.16
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGP104BGM107
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date15 August 2016 (8 years ago)3 December 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$389.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1920640
Core clock speed1506 MHz1029 MHz
Boost clock speed1645 MHz1098 MHz
Number of transistors7,200 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt55 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature94 °Cno data
Texture fill rate210.643.92
Floating-point processing power6.738 TFLOPS1.405 TFLOPS
ROPs6416
TMUs12840

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed8 GB/s1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
Display Portno data1.2
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost3.0no data
Optimus-+
3D Vision Prono data+
Mosaicno data+
VR Ready+no data
nView Display Managementno data+
Optimusno data+
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.131+
CUDA+5.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1070 Mobile 28.55
+219%
M2000M 8.96

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1070 Mobile 11000
+219%
M2000M 3453

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1070 Mobile 22576
+339%
M2000M 5143

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1070 Mobile 34389
+67.2%
M2000M 20567

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1070 Mobile 17237
+315%
M2000M 4157

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1070 Mobile 101041
+239%
M2000M 29795

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

GTX 1070 Mobile 78
+119%
M2000M 36

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

GTX 1070 Mobile 51
M2000M 70
+38.5%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

GTX 1070 Mobile 8
M2000M 33
+343%

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

GTX 1070 Mobile 72
+57.9%
M2000M 46

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

GTX 1070 Mobile 47
+18.4%
M2000M 40

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

GTX 1070 Mobile 40
+171%
M2000M 15

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

GTX 1070 Mobile 81
+269%
M2000M 22

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

GTX 1070 Mobile 8
+159%
M2000M 3

SPECviewperf 12 - Showcase

GTX 1070 Mobile 81
+269%
M2000M 22

SPECviewperf 12 - Maya

This part of SPECviewperf 12 workstation benchmark uses Autodesk Maya 13 engine to render a superhero energy plant static scene consisting of more than 700 thousand polygons, in six different modes.

GTX 1070 Mobile 78
+119%
M2000M 36

SPECviewperf 12 - Catia

GTX 1070 Mobile 72
+58.1%
M2000M 46

SPECviewperf 12 - Solidworks

GTX 1070 Mobile 51
M2000M 70
+38.5%

SPECviewperf 12 - Siemens NX

GTX 1070 Mobile 8
M2000M 33
+343%

SPECviewperf 12 - Creo

GTX 1070 Mobile 47
+18.4%
M2000M 40

SPECviewperf 12 - Medical

GTX 1070 Mobile 40
+171%
M2000M 15

SPECviewperf 12 - Energy

GTX 1070 Mobile 8.3
+159%
M2000M 3.2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD101
+181%
36
−181%
1440p60
+233%
18−20
−233%
4K42
+250%
12
−250%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.86no data
1440p6.50no data
4K9.29no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 75
+241%
21−24
−241%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 69
+431%
12−14
−431%
Battlefield 5 111
+311%
27−30
−311%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80
+344%
18−20
−344%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%
Far Cry 5 93
+343%
21−24
−343%
Far Cry New Dawn 101
+304%
24−27
−304%
Forza Horizon 4 241
+302%
60−65
−302%
Hitman 3 76
+347%
16−18
−347%
Horizon Zero Dawn 166
+232%
50−55
−232%
Metro Exodus 111
+296%
27−30
−296%
Red Dead Redemption 2 86
+244%
24−27
−244%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 137
+357%
30−33
−357%
Watch Dogs: Legion 150
+150%
60−65
−150%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 115
+423%
21−24
−423%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
+346%
12−14
−346%
Battlefield 5 99
+267%
27−30
−267%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 74
+311%
18−20
−311%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%
Far Cry 5 77
+267%
21−24
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 80
+220%
24−27
−220%
Forza Horizon 4 222
+270%
60−65
−270%
Hitman 3 75
+341%
16−18
−341%
Horizon Zero Dawn 156
+212%
50−55
−212%
Metro Exodus 97
+246%
27−30
−246%
Red Dead Redemption 2 81
+224%
24−27
−224%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+227%
30−33
−227%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 113
+56.9%
72
−56.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 149
+148%
60−65
−148%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 56
+155%
21−24
−155%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 50
+285%
12−14
−285%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 56
+211%
18−20
−211%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+236%
14−16
−236%
Far Cry 5 65
+210%
21−24
−210%
Forza Horizon 4 97
+61.7%
60−65
−61.7%
Hitman 3 65
+282%
16−18
−282%
Horizon Zero Dawn 99
+98%
50−55
−98%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 95−100
+227%
30−33
−227%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+329%
14
−329%
Watch Dogs: Legion 42
−42.9%
60−65
+42.9%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 77
+208%
24−27
−208%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 64
+276%
16−18
−276%
Far Cry New Dawn 53
+279%
14−16
−279%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+344%
9−10
−344%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+640%
5−6
−640%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 41
+356%
9−10
−356%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
Far Cry 5 42
+320%
10−11
−320%
Forza Horizon 4 181
+376%
35−40
−376%
Hitman 3 42
+250%
12−14
−250%
Horizon Zero Dawn 71
+274%
18−20
−274%
Metro Exodus 62
+417%
12−14
−417%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+540%
10−11
−540%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+363%
8−9
−363%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140
+146%
55−60
−146%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 59
+293%
14−16
−293%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 31
+288%
8−9
−288%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
+417%
6−7
−417%
Hitman 3 27
+440%
5−6
−440%
Horizon Zero Dawn 74
+106%
35−40
−106%
Metro Exodus 34
+386%
7−8
−386%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+333%
9
−333%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+380%
5−6
−380%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21
+425%
4−5
−425%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22
+450%
4−5
−450%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Far Cry 5 21
+320%
5−6
−320%
Forza Horizon 4 52
+373%
10−12
−373%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+620%
5−6
−620%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16
+433%
3−4
−433%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+233%
9−10
−233%

This is how GTX 1070 Mobile and M2000M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 181% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 233% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1070 Mobile is 250% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1070 Mobile is 700% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the M2000M is 43% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1070 Mobile is ahead in 71 test (99%)
  • M2000M is ahead in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 28.55 8.96
Recency 15 August 2016 3 December 2015
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 55 Watt

GTX 1070 Mobile has a 218.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

M2000M, on the other hand, has 118.2% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Quadro M2000M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 849 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 500 votes

Rate Quadro M2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.