Radeon R9 M295X vs GeForce GTX 1050

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 with Radeon R9 M295X, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050
2016
2 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
13.06

R9 M295X outperforms GTX 1050 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking389384
Place by popularity15not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation11.35no data
Power efficiency11.943.67
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGP107Amethyst
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)23 November 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6402048
Core clock speed1290 MHz723 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHzno data
Number of transistors3,300 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt250 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate58.2092.54
Floating-point processing power1.862 TFLOPS2.961 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs40128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportPCIe 3.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length145 mmno data
Height4.38" (11.1 cm)no data
Width2-slotno data
Recommended system power (PSU)300 Wattno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone
SLI-no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5Not Listed
Maximum RAM amount2 GB0 MB
Memory bus width128 BitNot Listed
Memory clock speed1752 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVINo outputs
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

FreeSync-+
HD3D-+
PowerTune-+
DualGraphics-+
ZeroCore-+
Switchable graphics-+
GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)Not Listed
Shader Model6.46.3
OpenGL4.54.4
OpenCL1.2Not Listed
Vulkan1.2.131-
Mantle-+
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 13.06
R9 M295X 13.37
+2.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 5034
R9 M295X 5150
+2.3%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 8571
R9 M295X 8851
+3.3%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 32463
+8.3%
R9 M295X 29972

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 6797
+3.1%
R9 M295X 6591

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 40922
+7.3%
R9 M295X 38132

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD43
−14%
49
+14%
1440p20
+11.1%
18−21
−11.1%
4K21
−23.8%
26
+23.8%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.53no data
1440p5.45no data
4K5.19no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 38
+22.6%
30−35
−22.6%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Battlefield 5 43
+0%
40−45
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 30−33
−3.3%
30−35
+3.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 35−40
−2.8%
35−40
+2.8%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−2.3%
85−90
+2.3%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−1.5%
65−70
+1.5%
Metro Exodus 46
+2.2%
45−50
−2.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−2.8%
35−40
+2.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52
+20.9%
40−45
−20.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+58.1%
30−35
−58.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Battlefield 5 35
−22.9%
40−45
+22.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 33
+6.5%
30−35
−6.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 16
−131%
35−40
+131%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−2.3%
85−90
+2.3%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65−70
−1.5%
65−70
+1.5%
Metro Exodus 37
−21.6%
45−50
+21.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−2.8%
35−40
+2.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
−22.9%
40−45
+22.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−113%
68
+113%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 15
−107%
30−35
+107%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 20−22
−5%
21−24
+5%
Far Cry 5 23
−34.8%
30−35
+34.8%
Forza Horizon 4 34
−159%
85−90
+159%
Hitman 3 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 26
−165%
65−70
+165%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 31
−38.7%
40−45
+38.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+17.6%
17
−17.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
−2.8%
35−40
+2.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
−3.1%
65−70
+3.1%
Hitman 3 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 25
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18
−22.2%
21−24
+22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
−2.5%
80−85
+2.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
−4.8%
21−24
+4.8%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
Hitman 3 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 15
+7.1%
14
−7.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 and R9 M295X compete in popular games:

  • R9 M295X is 14% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 is 11% faster in 1440p
  • R9 M295X is 24% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 is 58% faster.
  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R9 M295X is 165% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 is ahead in 8 tests (11%)
  • R9 M295X is ahead in 38 tests (53%)
  • there's a draw in 26 tests (36%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.06 13.37
Recency 25 October 2016 23 November 2014
Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 250 Watt

GTX 1050 has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 233.3% lower power consumption.

R9 M295X, on the other hand, has a 2.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1050 and Radeon R9 M295X.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 is a desktop card while Radeon R9 M295X is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050
GeForce GTX 1050
AMD Radeon R9 M295X
Radeon R9 M295X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 5801 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 17 votes

Rate Radeon R9 M295X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.