GeForce RTX 4060 vs GTX 1050 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile with GeForce RTX 4060, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Mobile
2017
4000 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
11.64

RTX 4060 outperforms GTX 1050 Mobile by a whopping 343% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking41251
Place by popularity982
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data100.00
Power efficiency10.6430.71
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGP107BAD107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6403072
Core clock speed1354 MHz1830 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz2460 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt115 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate59.72236.2
Floating-point processing power1.911 TFLOPS15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs4096
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4000 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz2125 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s272.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI-+
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Mobile 11.64
RTX 4060 51.51
+343%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Mobile 7693
RTX 4060 38191
+396%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Mobile 26560
RTX 4060 107451
+305%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Mobile 6068
RTX 4060 28111
+363%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Mobile 38042
RTX 4060 156140
+310%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Mobile 287287
RTX 4060 769721
+168%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p73
−311%
300−350
+311%
Full HD46
−215%
145
+215%
1440p24
−221%
77
+221%
4K15
−193%
44
+193%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data2.06
1440pno data3.88
4Kno data6.80

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
−186%
100−110
+186%
Battlefield 5 51
−218%
160−170
+218%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
−148%
95−100
+148%
Far Cry 5 39
−162%
100−110
+162%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
−224%
120−130
+224%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−289%
210−220
+289%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
−296%
100−110
+296%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−497%
190−200
+497%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
−253%
100−110
+253%
Battlefield 5 44
−268%
160−170
+268%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
−200%
95−100
+200%
Far Cry 5 36
−183%
100−110
+183%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
−232%
120−130
+232%
Forza Horizon 4 52
−312%
210−220
+312%
Metro Exodus 19
−674%
140−150
+674%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−664%
100−110
+664%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
−648%
217
+648%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
−169%
100−110
+169%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
−489%
100−110
+489%
Battlefield 5 37
−332%
160−170
+332%
Far Cry 5 33
−209%
100−110
+209%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
−324%
140−150
+324%
Forza Horizon 4 37
−478%
210−220
+478%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
−409%
112
+409%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
−317%
75−80
+317%
Metro Exodus 11
−309%
45−50
+309%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
−321%
80−85
+321%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−341%
75−80
+341%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
−338%
55−60
+338%
Battlefield 5 26
−323%
110−120
+323%
Far Cry 5 21
−181%
55−60
+181%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
−317%
100−105
+317%
Forza Horizon 4 26
−900%
260−270
+900%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
−300%
40−45
+300%
Metro Exodus 7
−900%
70−75
+900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
−309%
45−50
+309%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
−338%
35−40
+338%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
−580%
68
+580%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
−429%
35−40
+429%
Battlefield 5 13
−323%
55−60
+323%
Far Cry 5 11
−191%
30−35
+191%
Far Cry New Dawn 11
−309%
45−50
+309%
Forza Horizon 4 15
−393%
70−75
+393%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 139
+0%
139
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+0%
107
+0%
Hitman 3 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Metro Exodus 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 90
+0%
90
+0%
Hitman 3 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 80
+0%
80
+0%
Hitman 3 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 190
+0%
190
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Hitman 3 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Metro Exodus 111
+0%
111
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+0%
129
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hitman 3 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+0%
20
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 70
+0%
70
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and RTX 4060 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 is 311% faster in 900p
  • RTX 4060 is 215% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4060 is 221% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4060 is 193% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4060 is 900% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4060 is ahead in 30 tests (42%)
  • there's a draw in 42 tests (58%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.64 51.51
Recency 3 January 2017 18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4000 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 115 Watt

GTX 1050 Mobile has 53.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060, on the other hand, has a 342.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 104.8% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
GeForce RTX 4060

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1252 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 18476 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.