GeForce GT 1030 vs GTX 1050 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile with GeForce GT 1030, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Mobile
2017
4000 MB GDDR5, 75 Watt
11.64
+82.7%

GTX 1050 Mobile outperforms GT 1030 by an impressive 83% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking412576
Place by popularity9836
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.31
Power efficiency10.6414.56
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP107BGP108
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 January 2017 (7 years ago)17 May 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$79

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640384
Core clock speed1354 MHz1228 MHz
Boost clock speed1493 MHz1468 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt30 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate59.7235.23
Floating-point processing power1.911 TFLOPS1.127 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4024

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x4
Lengthno data145 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4000 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s48.06 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI1x DVI, 1x HDMI
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI-+
HDCP2.2-
G-SYNC support++

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+-
GPU Boost3.0no data
VR Readyno data+
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Mobile 11.64
+82.7%
GT 1030 6.37

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Mobile 7693
+62.7%
GT 1030 4728

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Mobile 26560
+31.5%
GT 1030 20192

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Mobile 6068
+67.4%
GT 1030 3625

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Mobile 38042
+72.4%
GT 1030 22069

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Mobile 287287
+31.1%
GT 1030 219163

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p73
+109%
35−40
−109%
Full HD46
+91.7%
24
−91.7%
1440p24
+4.3%
23
−4.3%
4K15
+87.5%
8
−87.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.29
1440pno data3.43
4Kno data9.88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 37
+106%
18
−106%
Battlefield 5 51
+132%
22
−132%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
+122%
18
−122%
Far Cry 5 39
+85.7%
21
−85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 38
+40.7%
27
−40.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−69.1%
93
+69.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
−14.8%
31
+14.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 33
−12.1%
37
+12.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+25%
24
−25%
Battlefield 5 44
+144%
18−20
−144%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
+106%
16
−106%
Far Cry 5 36
+157%
14−16
−157%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+85%
20
−85%
Forza Horizon 4 52
−61.5%
84
+61.5%
Metro Exodus 19
−5.3%
20
+5.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14
−7.1%
15
+7.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 29
+52.6%
19
−52.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 39
+95%
20−22
−95%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18
+157%
7
−157%
Battlefield 5 37
+106%
18−20
−106%
Far Cry 5 33
+136%
14−16
−136%
Far Cry New Dawn 33
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 37
+131%
16
−131%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+83.3%
12
−83.3%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18
+100%
9−10
−100%
Metro Exodus 11
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+90%
10−11
−90%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 13
+117%
6−7
−117%
Battlefield 5 26
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 21
+200%
7−8
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 24
+100%
12−14
−100%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+30%
20−22
−30%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10
+100%
5−6
−100%
Metro Exodus 7
+133%
3−4
−133%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8
+100%
4−5
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7
+600%
1
−600%
Battlefield 5 13
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Far Cry 5 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry New Dawn 11
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+114%
7
−114%

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+0%
11
+0%
Hitman 3 16
+0%
16
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 152
+0%
152
+0%
Metro Exodus 26
+0%
26
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 93
+0%
93
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7
+0%
7
+0%
Hitman 3 15
+0%
15
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 123
+0%
123
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 84
+0%
84
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5
+0%
5
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 19
+0%
19
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16
+0%
16
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6
+0%
6
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 19
+0%
19
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Hitman 3 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14
+0%
14
+0%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 11
+0%
11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 48
+0%
48
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 4
+0%
4
+0%
Hitman 3 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6
+0%
6
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Mobile and GT 1030 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 109% faster in 900p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 92% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 4% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Mobile is 88% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1050 Mobile is 600% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GT 1030 is 69% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Mobile is ahead in 24 tests (34%)
  • GT 1030 is ahead in 6 tests (8%)
  • there's a draw in 41 test (58%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.64 6.37
Recency 3 January 2017 17 May 2017
Maximum RAM amount 4000 MB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 30 Watt

GTX 1050 Mobile has a 82.7% higher aggregate performance score.

GT 1030, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 2.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 150% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 1030 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile is a notebook card while GeForce GT 1030 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030
GeForce GT 1030

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 1252 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 7838 votes

Rate GeForce GT 1030 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.