RTX A4500 Mobile vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with RTX A4500 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.39

RTX A4500 Mobile outperforms GTX 1050 Ti by a whopping 176% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking33178
Place by popularity5not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.02no data
Power efficiency14.9822.14
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGP107GA104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)22 March 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7685888
Core clock speed1291 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speed1392 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt140 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.82276.0
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPS17.66 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs48184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed7008 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+8.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.39
RTX A4500 Mobile 45.22
+176%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Ti 6317
RTX A4500 Mobile 17424
+176%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
−160%
130−140
+160%
1440p29
−176%
80−85
+176%
4K24
−171%
65−70
+171%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.78no data
1440p4.79no data
4K5.79no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+1500%
3−4
−1500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−159%
70−75
+159%
Battlefield 5 53
−164%
140−150
+164%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−163%
100−105
+163%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
−173%
120−130
+173%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−167%
280−290
+167%
Hitman 3 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+925%
8−9
−925%
Metro Exodus 56
−168%
150−160
+168%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
+1900%
4−5
−1900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+193%
27−30
−193%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 64
+2033%
3−4
−2033%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−159%
70−75
+159%
Battlefield 5 44
−173%
120−130
+173%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Far Cry 5 35
−171%
95−100
+171%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
−168%
110−120
+168%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−167%
280−290
+167%
Hitman 3 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+925%
8−9
−925%
Metro Exodus 46
−161%
120−130
+161%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50
+1150%
4−5
−1150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+322%
9−10
−322%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+193%
27−30
−193%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+700%
3−4
−700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
−159%
70−75
+159%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+1550%
2−3
−1550%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+1200%
2−3
−1200%
Far Cry 5 27
−159%
70−75
+159%
Forza Horizon 4 45
−167%
120−130
+167%
Hitman 3 30−35
+675%
4−5
−675%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+463%
8−9
−463%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43
+975%
4−5
−975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+189%
9−10
−189%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+193%
27−30
−193%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
−167%
120−130
+167%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
−166%
85−90
+166%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−160%
65−70
+160%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
−150%
35−40
+150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10 0−1
Far Cry 5 18−20
−163%
50−55
+163%
Forza Horizon 4 75
−167%
200−210
+167%
Hitman 3 18−20
+217%
6−7
−217%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+1500%
2−3
−1500%
Metro Exodus 29
−176%
80−85
+176%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
−167%
80−85
+167%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−150%
45−50
+150%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
−173%
270−280
+173%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+1250%
2−3
−1250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Hitman 3 12−14
−150%
30−33
+150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
−165%
220−230
+165%
Metro Exodus 14
−150%
35−40
+150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
−150%
40−45
+150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−163%
21−24
+163%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−167%
8−9
+167%
Far Cry 5 9−10
−167%
24−27
+167%
Forza Horizon 4 20
−175%
55−60
+175%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
−165%
45−50
+165%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
−157%
18−20
+157%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+650%
2−3
−650%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and RTX A4500 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 160% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 176% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A4500 Mobile is 171% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Odyssey, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti is 2033% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1050 Ti surpassed RTX A4500 Mobile in all 29 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.39 45.22
Recency 25 October 2016 22 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 140 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has 86.7% lower power consumption.

RTX A4500 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 175.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A4500 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while RTX A4500 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
NVIDIA RTX A4500 Mobile
RTX A4500 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 206910 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 17 votes

Rate RTX A4500 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.