Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti with Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1050 Ti
2016
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
16.39
+42.4%

GTX 1050 Ti outperforms Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS by a considerable 42% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking331416
Place by popularity5not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation14.02no data
Power efficiency14.9819.73
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)no data
GPU code nameGP107no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date25 October 2016 (8 years ago)no data
Launch price (MSRP)$139 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681536
Core clock speed1291 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1392 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology14 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt40 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate66.82no data
Floating-point processing power2.138 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs48no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount4 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed7008 MHz8448 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortno data
HDMI+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Ansel+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti 16.39
+42.4%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 11.51

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Ti 9453
+33.9%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 7061

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Ti 7485
+7.2%
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS 6982

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50
+35.1%
37
−35.1%
1440p29
+61.1%
18−21
−61.1%
4K24
+50%
16−18
−50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.78no data
1440p4.79no data
4K5.79no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+60%
30−33
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Battlefield 5 53
+51.4%
35−40
−51.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 40−45
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+50%
70−75
−50%
Hitman 3 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+49.1%
55−60
−49.1%
Metro Exodus 56
+60%
35−40
−60%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+49.1%
55−60
−49.1%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 64
+60%
40−45
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Battlefield 5 44
+46.7%
30−33
−46.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+50%
70−75
−50%
Hitman 3 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+49.1%
55−60
−49.1%
Metro Exodus 46
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50
+42.9%
35−40
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+58.3%
24−27
−58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+49.1%
55−60
−49.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+50%
16−18
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 27
+50%
18−20
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
Hitman 3 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 43
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+49.1%
55−60
−49.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 75
+50%
50−55
−50%
Hitman 3 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 32
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Metro Exodus 29
+61.1%
18−20
−61.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+50%
12−14
−50%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+52.3%
65−70
−52.3%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+50.9%
55−60
−50.9%
Metro Exodus 14
+55.6%
9−10
−55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 17
+70%
10−11
−70%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+75%
4−5
−75%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti and Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1050 Ti is 35% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 61% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1050 Ti is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.39 11.51
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 40 Watt

GTX 1050 Ti has a 42.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS, on the other hand, has a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 87.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Ti is a desktop card while Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS
SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.3 206911 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 13 votes

Rate Qualcomm SD X Adreno X1-85 4.6 TFLOPS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.