Arc A530M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Arc A530M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
15.26

Arc A530M outperforms GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by a significant 23% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking358308
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.9519.74
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGP107DG2-256
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 January 2017 (8 years ago)1 August 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681536
Core clock speed1493 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speed1620 MHz1300 MHz
Number of transistors3,300 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature97 °Cno data
Texture fill rate77.76124.8
Floating-point processing power2.488 TFLOPS3.994 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs4896
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed7 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth112 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA+-
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD56
−16.1%
65−70
+16.1%
1440p25
−20%
30−35
+20%
4K17
−5.9%
18−21
+5.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 59
−25.4%
70−75
+25.4%
Far Cry 5 47
−27.7%
60−65
+27.7%
Fortnite 80−85
−17.3%
95−100
+17.3%
Forza Horizon 4 62
−16.1%
70−75
+16.1%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 56
−17.9%
65−70
+17.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 49
−51%
70−75
+51%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 124
−77.4%
220−230
+77.4%
Dota 2 92
−19.6%
110−120
+19.6%
Far Cry 5 44
−36.4%
60−65
+36.4%
Fortnite 76
−25%
95−100
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 57
−26.3%
70−75
+26.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 55
−20%
65−70
+20%
Metro Exodus 19
−94.7%
35−40
+94.7%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 52
−26.9%
65−70
+26.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 47
−4.3%
45−50
+4.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
−76.2%
70−75
+76.2%
Dota 2 86
−16.3%
100−105
+16.3%
Far Cry 5 40
−50%
60−65
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 43
−67.4%
70−75
+67.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
−69.2%
65−70
+69.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−88.5%
45−50
+88.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 54
−75.9%
95−100
+75.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 100−110
−20.8%
120−130
+20.8%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
−30.4%
30−33
+30.4%
Metro Exodus 12
−83.3%
21−24
+83.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
−72.4%
50−55
+72.4%
Far Cry 5 26
−50%
35−40
+50%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−25.7%
40−45
+25.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
−25%
40−45
+25%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−23.1%
30−35
+23.1%
Metro Exodus 7
−100%
14−16
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 17
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 20−22
−30%
24−27
+30%
Dota 2 50−55
−17.6%
60−65
+17.6%
Far Cry 5 12
−58.3%
18−20
+58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−24%
30−35
+24%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
−21.4%
16−18
+21.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9
−100%
18−20
+100%

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Arc A530M compete in popular games:

  • Arc A530M is 16% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A530M is 20% faster in 1440p
  • Arc A530M is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A530M is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc A530M is ahead in 35 tests (55%)
  • there's a draw in 29 tests (45%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.26 18.72
Recency 3 January 2017 1 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 65 Watt

Arc A530M has a 22.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 15.4% lower power consumption.

The Arc A530M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti
Intel Arc A530M
Arc A530M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 871 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 204 votes

Rate Arc A530M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile or Arc A530M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.