GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs GTX 1050 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	434	268
Place by popularity	not in top-100	69
Power efficiency	9.81	28.17
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GP107	TU116
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	3 January 2018 (6 years ago)	23 April 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1024
Core clock speed	1190 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	1328 MHz	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	53.12	95.04
Floating-point processing power	1.7 TFLOPS	3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	40	64

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.140
CUDA	6.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 10.56

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.21
+91.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 4073

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+91.4%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 7154

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+85.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 26081

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 43517
+66.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 5650

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 9930
+75.8%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 35392

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 65163
+84.1%

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 318811

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 410191
+28.7%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

GTX 1050 Max-Q 1615

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 3618
+124%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	43 −34.9%	58 +34.9%
1440p	24 −75%	42 +75%
4K	14 −92.9%	27 +92.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−269%

59
+269%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 −64.9%	61 +64.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −206%	49 +206%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −100%	65−70 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	31 −71%	53 +71%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −188%	46 +188%
Far Cry 5	37 −86.5%	69 +86.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −190%	84 +190%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −77.1%	120−130 +77.1%
Hitman 3	20−22 −155%	51 +155%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −218%	181 +218%
Metro Exodus	44 −107%	91 +107%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +0%	44 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 −6.3%	65−70 +6.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −209%	201 +209%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −80%	45−50 +80%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −100%	32 +100%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −100%	65−70 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	29 −62.1%	47 +62.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −125%	36 +125%
Far Cry 5	30 −93.3%	58 +93.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −103%	59 +103%
Forza Horizon 4	97 −27.8%	120−130 +27.8%
Hitman 3	20−22 −150%	50 +150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −216%	180 +216%
Metro Exodus	35 −126%	79 +126%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30 −30%	39 +30%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −121%	75 +121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −60.7%	45−50 +60.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −182%	183 +182%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16 −68.8%	27 +68.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +6.7%	15 −6.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	19 −63.2%	31 +63.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −113%	34 +113%
Far Cry 5	22 −77.3%	39 +77.3%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −77.1%	120−130 +77.1%
Hitman 3	20−22 −115%	43 +115%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −12.3%	64 +12.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −85.3%	63 +85.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21 −85.7%	39 +85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +195%	22 −195%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−32.3%

41
+32.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −85.7%	35−40 +85.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −138%	38 +138%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10 −110%	21−24 +110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −157%	18−20 +157%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	11 −100%	21−24 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −220%	16 +220%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −117%	26 +117%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −135%	110−120 +135%
Hitman 3	14−16 −100%	28 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −86.4%	40−45 +86.4%
Metro Exodus	24 −58.3%	35−40 +58.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −173%	40−45 +173%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −130%	21−24 +130%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −79.1%	120 +79.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−65%

30−35
+65%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −100%	20−22 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −150%	20 +150%
Hitman 3	7−8 −129%	16 +129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +11.9%	42 −11.9%
Metro Exodus	13 −69.2%	21−24 +69.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −92.3%	25 +92.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6 −100%	12−14 +100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −100%	10−11 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6 −83.3%	10−12 +83.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6 +500%
Far Cry 5	6 −100%	12 +100%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −115%	27−30 +115%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −188%	21−24 +188%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−80%

18−20
+80%

This is how GTX 1050 Max-Q and GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compete in popular games:

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 35% faster in 1080p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 75% faster in 1440p
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 93% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1050 Max-Q is 195% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 500% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1050 Max-Q is ahead in 3 tests (4%)
GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is ahead in 68 tests (94%)
there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.56	20.21
Recency	3 January 2018	23 April 2020
Chip lithography	14 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	50 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has a 91.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.