Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) vs GeForce GTS 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GT 335M GTS 250M GTS 260M GTS 350M GTS 360M
VS
Radeon R2 (Mullins/Beema/Carrizo-L) Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) Radeon R2 Mobile Graphics Radeon R2E Mobile Graphics

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTS 350M and Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTS 350M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 28 Watt
1.00

R2 (Stoney Ridge) outperforms GTS 350M by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTS 350M GTS 350M
R2 (Stoney Ridge) R2 (Stoney Ridge)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11151111
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.484.77
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code nameGT215Stoney Ridge
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)1 June 2016 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96128
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors727 million3100 Million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)28 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate16.00no data
Floating-point processing power0.24 TFLOPSno data
Gigaflops360no data
ROPs8no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfaceMXM-IIno data
SLI options+-
MXM TypeMXM 3.0 Type-Bno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3no data
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 2000 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortLVDSHDMIDual Link DVISingle Link DVIVGAno data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model4.1no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A+
CUDA+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Valorant 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
−7.1%
14−16
+7.1%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Valorant 30−35
−3.2%
30−35
+3.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Valorant 0−1 1−2

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Far Cry 5, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the R2 (Stoney Ridge) is 100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • R2 (Stoney Ridge) is ahead in 7 tests (17%)
  • there's a draw in 35 tests (83%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.00 1.03
Recency 7 January 2010 1 June 2016
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 28 Watt 15 Watt

R2 (Stoney Ridge) has a 3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 86.7% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTS 350M and Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge).

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 350M
GeForce GTS 350M
AMD Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
9800M GT GeForce 9800M GT
R2 (Stoney Ridge) Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge)
vs
HD Graphics 5300 HD Graphics 5300
GTS 350M GeForce GTS 350M
vs
GT 420M GeForce GT 420M
RX 6500M AMD RX 6500M
vs
HD 6550M 6550M
RTX 4090 NVIDIA RTX 4090
vs
HD 6550M 6550M
R5 M230 AMD R5 M230
vs
GTS 350M 350M
HD 8570M AMD HD 8570M
vs
GTS 350M 350M
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
vs
GTS 350M 350M
HD 7470M AMD HD 7470M
vs
GTS 350M 350M
RTX 4090 NVIDIA RTX 4090
vs
GTS 350M 350M
GeForce4 Ti 4200 NVIDIA Ti 4200
vs
GTS 250M 250M
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
vs
HD 6630M 6630M
HD Graphics 4000 HD Graphics 4000
vs
HD 6630M 6630M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce GTS 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 38 votes

Rate Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTS 350M or Radeon R2 (Stoney Ridge), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.