UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs GeForce GT 430

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 430 with UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), including specs and performance data.

GT 430
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 49 Watt
1.55

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) outperforms GT 430 by a whopping 103% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking970753
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency2.178.61
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGF108Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date11 October 2010 (14 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9632
CUDA cores per GPU96no data
Core clock speed700 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1100 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt12-25 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature98 °Cno data
Texture fill rate11.20no data
Floating-point processing power0.2688 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs16no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0 x 16no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length145 mmno data
Height2.713" (6.9 cm)no data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR4
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed800 - 900 MHz (1600 - 1800 data rate)no data
Memory bandwidth25.6 - 28.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsHDMIVGA (optional)Mini HDMIDual Link DVIno data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIInternalno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12_1
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.2no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 430 1.55
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 3.14
+103%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GT 430 720
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) 1521
+111%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−117%
13
+117%
4K4−5
−125%
9
+125%

Cost per frame, $

1080p13.17no data
4K19.75no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−33.3%
8
+33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−100%
10
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Hitman 3 6−7
+0%
6
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−53.3%
21−24
+53.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−100%
6
+100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−44.4%
12−14
+44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−14.7%
35−40
+14.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−100%
8−9
+100%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−53.3%
21−24
+53.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−22.2%
11
+22.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−14.7%
35−40
+14.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−50%
9−10
+50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−40%
7−8
+40%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−200%
6−7
+200%
Forza Horizon 4 4−5
−300%
16−18
+300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−53.3%
21−24
+53.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−44.4%
13
+44.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+120%
5
−120%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−14.7%
35−40
+14.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−133%
7−8
+133%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−150%
5−6
+150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Hitman 3 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−60%
8−9
+60%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
−125%
18−20
+125%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−50%
6−7
+50%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 12
+0%
12
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Battlefield 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

This is how GT 430 and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) compete in popular games:

  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 117% faster in 1080p
  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 125% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GT 430 is 120% faster.
  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GT 430 is ahead in 1 test (2%)
  • UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is ahead in 45 tests (76%)
  • there's a draw in 13 tests (22%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.55 3.14
Recency 11 October 2010 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 40 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 12 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has a 102.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% more advanced lithography process, and 308.3% lower power consumption.

The UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 430 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 430 is a desktop card while UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
GeForce GT 430
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 1127 votes

Rate GeForce GT 430 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 366 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.