GeForce RTX 4060 Ti vs GT 415M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GT 415M with GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, including specs and performance data.

GT 415M
2010
512 MB DDR3, 12 Watt
0.64

RTX 4060 Ti outperforms GT 415M by a whopping 7844% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking117142
Place by popularitynot in top-10019
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data83.07
Power efficiency4.2325.35
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF108AD106
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 September 2010 (14 years ago)18 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores484352
Core clock speed500 MHz2310 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2535 MHz
Number of transistors585 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000344.8
Floating-point processing power0.096 TFLOPS22.06 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs8136
Tensor Coresno data136
Ray Tracing Coresno data34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GT 415M 0.64
RTX 4060 Ti 50.84
+7844%

  • Passmark

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GT 415M 286
RTX 4060 Ti 22733
+7849%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Atomic Heart 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%
Valorant 27−30
−7831%
2300−2350
+7831%
Atomic Heart 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
−7650%
1550−1600
+7650%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Dota 2 12−14
−7592%
1000−1050
+7592%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Valorant 27−30
−7831%
2300−2350
+7831%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
−7757%
550−600
+7757%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Dota 2 12−14
−7592%
1000−1050
+7592%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−6900%
350−400
+6900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−7400%
600−650
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Valorant 27−30
−7831%
2300−2350
+7831%
Counter-Strike 2 0−1 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 3−4
−7567%
230−240
+7567%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Fortnite 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
Atomic Heart 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−7567%
1150−1200
+7567%
Valorant 4−5
−7400%
300−310
+7400%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−7400%
75−80
+7400%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%
Fortnite 2−3
−7400%
150−160
+7400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.64 50.84
Recency 3 September 2010 18 May 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 160 Watt

GT 415M has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060 Ti, on the other hand, has a 7843.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GT 415M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GT 415M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4060 Ti is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 415M
GeForce GT 415M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7
26 votes

Rate GeForce GT 415M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4
9892 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 415M or GeForce RTX 4060 Ti, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.