ATI Radeon 9000 PRO vs GeForce Go 6800 Ultra

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Rage 7 (2001−2006)
GPU code nameNV41RV250
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date24 February 2005 (19 years ago)1 July 2002 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores17no data
Core clock speed450 MHz275 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors190 million36 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)89 Watt28 Watt
Texture fill rate5.4001.100
ROPs84
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependent1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)8.1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.0 (full) 2.1 (partial)1.4
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 February 2005 1 July 2002
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 130 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 89 Watt 28 Watt

Go 6800 Ultra has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 15.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9000 PRO, on the other hand, has 217.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 6800 Ultra and Radeon 9000 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce Go 6800 Ultra is a notebook card while Radeon 9000 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
ATI Radeon 9000 PRO
Radeon 9000 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 4 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 13 votes

Rate Radeon 9000 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.