ATI Radeon E4690 vs GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data2.49
Architectureno dataTeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameno dataRV730
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (17 years ago)1 June 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores24320
Core clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistorsno data514 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30 Watt
Texture fill rateno data19.20
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataMXM-II
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountno data512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1010.1
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLno data3.3
OpenCLno data1.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 1 June 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm

ATI E4690 has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 18% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost and Radeon E4690. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost is a notebook graphics card while Radeon E4690 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 15 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon E4690 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M GeForceBoost or Radeon E4690, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.