Iris Pro Graphics P6300 vs GeForce 830A

Place in the ranking	765	690
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	6.40	18.88
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2017)	Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code name	GM108	Broadwell GT3e
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	22 July 2014 (10 years ago)	5 September 2014 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	256	384
Core clock speed	1082 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	1150 MHz	800 MHz
Number of transistors	no data	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	18.40	38.40
Floating-point processing power	0.5888 TFLOPS	0.6144 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	6
TMUs	16	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x8	IGP
Width	no data	IGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	64 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.80
CUDA	5.0	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 830A 3.08

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 4.13
+34.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 830A 1187

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 1592
+34.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.08	4.13
Recency	22 July 2014	5 September 2014
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	33 Watt	15 Watt

Iris Pro Graphics P6300 has a 34.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 month, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 120% lower power consumption.

The Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 830A in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 830A is a notebook card while Iris Pro Graphics P6300 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.