GeForce RTX 5080 vs 825M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 886 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 4.25 | no data |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) | Blackwell 2.0 (2025) |
| GPU code name | GK208 | GB203 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 27 January 2014 (10 years ago) | 21 January 2025 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $1,299 |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 384 | 10752 |
| Core clock speed | 850 MHz | 2300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 941 MHz | 2475 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 915 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 0 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 360 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 30.11 | 831.6 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.7227 TFLOPS | 53.22 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 128 |
| TMUs | 32 | 336 |
| Tensor Cores | no data | 336 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 84 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 5.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 304 mm |
| Width | no data | 3-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR7 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 2400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 973.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
| HDMI | - | + |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Optimus | + | - |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | + | 10.1 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 27 January 2014 | 21 January 2025 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 360 Watt |
GeForce 825M has 990.9% lower power consumption.
RTX 5080, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount.
We couldn't decide between GeForce 825M and GeForce RTX 5080. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that GeForce 825M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 5080 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
