RTX 5880 Ada Generation vs GeForce 315M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 315M with RTX 5880 Ada Generation, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 315M
2011
Up to 512 MB GDDR3, 14 Watt
0.30

RTX 5880 Ada Generation outperforms 315M by a whopping 29803% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13294
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.4721.58
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGT218AD102
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date5 January 2011 (13 years ago)5 January 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1614080
Core clock speed606 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2460 MHz
Number of transistors260 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt285 Watt
Texture fill rate4.8481,082
Floating-point processing power0.03878 TFLOPS69.27 TFLOPS
Gigaflops73no data
ROPs4176
TMUs8440
Tensor Coresno data440
Ray Tracing Coresno data110

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amountUp to 512 MB48 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s864.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI+-
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power management8.0no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.8
OpenGL4.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GeForce 315M 0.30
RTX 5880 Ada Generation 89.71
+29803%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 315M 115
RTX 5880 Ada Generation 34568
+29959%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−27400%
550−600
+27400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−28233%
850−900
+28233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−27400%
550−600
+27400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−27400%
550−600
+27400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−28650%
1150−1200
+28650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−29275%
2350−2400
+29275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−28650%
1150−1200
+28650%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−29721%
8350−8400
+29721%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−28233%
850−900
+28233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−27400%
550−600
+27400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−27400%
550−600
+27400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−28650%
1150−1200
+28650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−29275%
2350−2400
+29275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−28650%
1150−1200
+28650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−29344%
2650−2700
+29344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−29721%
8350−8400
+29721%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−28233%
850−900
+28233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−27400%
550−600
+27400%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−27400%
550−600
+27400%
Hitman 3 4−5
−28650%
1150−1200
+28650%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−29275%
2350−2400
+29275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5
−28650%
1150−1200
+28650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−29344%
2650−2700
+29344%
Watch Dogs: Legion 27−30
−29721%
8350−8400
+29721%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hitman 3 6−7
−29067%
1750−1800
+29067%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−27400%
550−600
+27400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−27400%
550−600
+27400%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−28900%
290−300
+28900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−27400%
550−600
+27400%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.30 89.71
Recency 5 January 2011 5 January 2024
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 285 Watt

GeForce 315M has 1935.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5880 Ada Generation, on the other hand, has a 29803.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 5880 Ada Generation is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 315M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 315M is a notebook card while RTX 5880 Ada Generation is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce 315M
GeForce 315M
NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation
RTX 5880 Ada Generation

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 157 votes

Rate GeForce 315M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 17 votes

Rate RTX 5880 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.