Tesla K20m vs FirePro W7000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared FirePro W7000 and Tesla K20m, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FirePro W7000
2012
4 GB GDDR5, 350 Watt
11.02

Tesla K20m outperforms W7000 by a minimal 4% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking424417
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.010.62
Power efficiency5.043.50
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code namePitcairnGK110
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date13 June 2012 (12 years ago)5 January 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$899 $3,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro W7000 has 224% better value for money than Tesla K20m.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802496
Core clock speed950 MHz706 MHz
Number of transistors2,800 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)350 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate76.00146.8
Floating-point processing power2.432 TFLOPS3.524 TFLOPS
ROPs3240
TMUs80208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCIe 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length242 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Form factorfull height / full lengthno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB5 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit320 Bit
Memory clock speed1200 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth153.6 GB/s208.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
StereoOutput3D+-
DisplayPort count4no data
Dual-link DVI support+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro W7000 11.02
Tesla K20m 11.50
+4.4%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FirePro W7000 4246
Tesla K20m 4432
+4.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.02 11.50
Recency 13 June 2012 5 January 2013
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 5 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 350 Watt 225 Watt

Tesla K20m has a 4.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 months, a 25% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 55.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between FirePro W7000 and Tesla K20m.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro W7000
FirePro W7000
NVIDIA Tesla K20m
Tesla K20m

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 57 votes

Rate FirePro W7000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 17 votes

Rate Tesla K20m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.